Broken Promises and Budget Shortfalls
Broken Promises and Budget Shortfalls
by Andy Caldwell
The 2024-25 proposed final Santa Barbara County budget represents an abysmal failure in several respects as it pertains to ethics, the economy, and the environment.
Ethical Shortcomings
Regarding ethics, county supervisors, years ago, promised to address the gargantuan shortfall in maintaining our roads, parks, and buildings by spending an additional 18% per year in increases from discretionary revenue (revenue that is not bound by state and federal mandates).
Accordingly, the county went from spending a paltry $1 million per year on maintenance to $15 million from their general fund (discretionary) monies. Other funds to maintain infrastructure come from federal and state gas taxes and SB1 funds. 2024 marks the first of five years in a row that the sups are planning on reneging on their promise to add the 18% funding even though this will doom their commitment to catch up on over $500 million in maintenance shortfalls.
Instead of serving their constituents, the budget proposes to spend the money on staff.
When did averting layoffs become a higher priority than public safety and infrastructure?
Besides averting layoffs, the budget proposes to spend the money on things like racial justice grants ($275k), a new County DEI Coordinator ($100k plus?), $2.4 million electric vehicle infrastructure, and over $1 million on their climate action plan and clean vehicle program. Moreover, the board is still failing to maintain the capacity of the county jail, by way of virtually closing the south county jail, without increasing the capacity of the north county jail commensurately. Moreover, how is it a higher priority that each supervisor maintains their own off-budget individual slush fund (read: “earmarks”) that adds up to $100k per year for each supervisor?
All in all, the county budget grew by over $100 million in the last year, meaning out of a $1.6 billion budget, the board has no excuse to fail to maintain our crumbling roads and other county infrastructure, which is going to cause them to fall further and further behind over the next five years.
Economic Failure
The county (Social Services Dept.) had the audacity to list $75 million per month in welfare benefits as “economic stimulus” with a multiplier effect no less and as a departmental accomplishment.
Let me explain why this poverty indicator is nothing to celebrate.
When somebody earns and spends money, that money “multiplies” throughout our economy as it is used to pay vendors and suppliers. However, productive members of society must pay higher taxes to pay for welfare benefits, or worse yet, when government borrows the money to pay for those welfare benefits, it causes inflation
Either way, the money spent does not “multiply” throughout our economy, except as it pertains to the growth of government. Instead, it represents a form of debt and deficit spending. Moreover, portions of the money get siphoned off (divided, not multiplied) by bureaucrats in Washington, DC, Sacramento, and Santa Barbara County who all get paid to manage the welfare programs. Santa Barbara County’s Social Services department has 900 employees and a budget of some $236 million per year not counting the $900 million per year doled out to residents by way of debt and deficit spending.
This is not an accomplishment.
Environmental and Ecological Misdeeds
Consider the fact that an organization the county belongs to and helps lead (Das Williams chairs the governing board), 3CE (a renewable energy farce), is raping the environment to save it. 3CE is paving over the desert to build a solar farm near the town of Boron, including stirring up Valley Fever fungus spores and removing some 3,500 Joshua Trees (some of which are 100 years old) that are now being considered for protection by the CA Endangered Species Act. Another project of theirs, involves a 550-mile transmission line through pristine, undisturbed wilderness including Native American cultural and heritage sites, which is being challenged in court by affected tribes and environmentalists.
Would you have approved any of these projects in your own jurisdiction?
Locally, the county has protected poison ivy, oak trees, nonnative eucalyptus trees and even the lichen on boulders, thereby proving themselves environmentally righteous at home, but wretched hypocrites as it pertains to previously undisturbed habitat elsewhere, including the deep strip mines in third world countries supplying metals (lithium and cobalt) for the so-called green revolution.
Dear Supervisors: Please ask yourselves if the majority of taxpayers in our county are in support of these broken promises and misplaced priorities.
SB Current is a reader-supported publication. If you enjoy receiving our mix of daily features please consider upgrading to a paid subscription.
If you’d rather not tie yourself to a monthly or yearly contribution, a one-time donation would work too.
Whatever you choose, your encouragement and patronage is greatly appreciated.
SB City Council is squeezing the middle & low income.
First the Council agreed to rent control. Which has always failed.
But they voted to increase every tenant’s rent up to 10% every year. They just made renting more expense ever the masses who have been long term rentals.
Previously landlords did not bump up rent every year and they did not bump it by 10%.
SB City Council agreed to put a half cent sales tax increase on the ballot. It will raise an estimated $15,000,000. Don’t celebrate.
City is close to $12,000,000 in debt.
That extra tax goes to paying down debt.
It does not go to housing like Sneddon stated.
That is an increase tax of about $600 per household.
So they voted to increase your rent & your taxes on top of record high inflation & increasing interest rates.
While they misappropriate tax dollars on non revenue generating expenses like the State Street underpass which will cost well above $7,000,000.
Fiscally irresponsible.
Get woke,go broke. There’s gotta be an end to this idiocy.