Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Renner's avatar

Once again, the issue continues to proceed with a blind spot in the conversations about California's water. The commercial salmon industry recently was valued at $1.5 billion...that's billion with a B. For the last 2 years, and probably next year as well, the fishery has been closed. Not only does the fishery face closures, extinction is also becoming a very real possibility This doesn't even consider the economic value of the recreational sector. Water released to the Pacific is NOT wasted water. Additionally, since the earliest contracts with the State, native fish (salmon) have senior rights. Very shortsighted article.

Expand full comment
LT's avatar
1dEdited

More Chicken Little, the sky is falling lunacy from the left. Let’s try to understand the party stance; we have to limit/eliminate dams and reservoirs in order to save the Smelt, but destroy our economy? We have to allow our forests to become overgrown to their natural state in order to save our environment, but burn up our homes in the process? We have to close our oil refineries in order to save our planet, but go bankrupt in the process?

This is what the left does, they use a bizarre matrix to make their case, ignoring the need for humans to prosper despite the “environment.”

This is why companies such as Standard Oil are leaving California and taking jobs from our economy, because of nutty, unhinged policies, perpetrated by white, liberal elites on the rest of us.

In order to meet future demands, the State of California must change course, allowing for forests to be free from becoming ticketing time bombs, building new, advanced refineries, building nuclear power plants, building or renovating desalination water facilities and upgrading or building new, advanced water storage infrastructure.

Expand full comment
39 more comments...

No posts