Discussion about this post

User's avatar
DANA NEWQUIST's avatar

Kidding!? Our Liberal City would never think of awarding/applauding Mesa Cafe their achievements! They would award Montecito Journal for turning a wonderful Community Oriented paper into a Liberal periodical.

Like Reagan, Trump is going to “Tear down This Wall”!

Expand full comment
Howard Walther's avatar

I read this article by Ms. Donovan Titled “Celebrating Achievements” in Santa Barbara that

focuses on “The Mesa Cafe” a fond place in my heart and stomach since I use to live close by.

I provide another Title of “Acknowledging Accountability” that many may have missed in

recent news on a consistent problem in Santa Barbara weblink below titled >>

https://tinyurl.com/bddss7cd

“Santa Barbara County Superior Court Judge Michael Carrozzo facing formal proceedings over alleged abuses of his position ...” According to this article Judge Carrozzo and I quote “According to the Commission on Judicial Performance's Notice of Formal Proceedings, Judge Carrozzo specifically violated the language of article VI, section 18 of the California Constitution in six specific counts:”

The six counts against the former Assistant Presiding Judge and Presiding Judge from 2018 to 2020 are listed and explained in this article that amounts to slap-on-the-wrist infractions however count 2 states as follows “Provided statements to the Commission in response to alleged violations of the Code of Judicial Ethics that were "false, misleading, and reflected a lack of candor" and “Your conduct violated canons 1, 2, 2A, 4A, and 4G of the Code of Judicial Ethics, as well as sections 6125 and 6126(a) of the California Business and Professions Code."

So what was “Going Down” in the Santa Barbara County Court from “2018 to 2020” that might be a little more serious “On Orders of Magnitude.” And how did “Someone” find these minor infractions; specifically, from Judge Carrozo's emails and cell phone texts.

Let's seque back to former FBI Executive Tom Parker's article on “2/22/2020” titled “Perceptions of Political Corruption Too Often the Harbingers of Stark Reality” and I quote from same “Upon close inspection by trained investigators, the proscribed relationship between the official and the co-conspirator becomes apparent. It can also surface when those plotting the scheme covertly agree to conceal their being symbiotically joined at their hip pockets. In today’s electronic world of emails and high-speed research, such concealment rarely lasts, and the act, or the perception of one, pops to the surface at the most unexpected times, such as right before an upcoming election.”

In defense of Judge Carrozzo, he was helping his secretary that became his wife where there was no consequences to anyone for his actions. Furthermore, Judge Carrozzo is well known for pushing back against the SB DA's Office's heavy-handed and costly litigation; weblink below>

Santa Barbara Judge Rejects DA Motion to Disqualify Him From MS-13 Case | Local News | Noozhawk

If you are going to charge Judicial Officers for Misconduct than do so with real charges but not for these nonsensical and minor charges against Judge Carrozzo.

So what was really “Going Down” in the little ole beach town of Santa Barbara?

Are there Concealed very serious charges of Judicial Misconduct at the CA Judicial Commission?

Howard Walther, member of a Military Family

PS1 - from the Weblink article above and I quote "Disparaging remarks were also made [in emails] about other Santa Barbara County Superior Court Judges including Judge Jean Dandona, Judge Patricia Kelly, Judge James Herman, then-Assistant Presiding Judge Gutavo Lavayen, Judge Raimondo Montes De Oca, Judge Pauline Maxwell, and Judge Donna Geck shared the Commission."

Exactly what statements did Judge Carrozzo make against this many Judges and were they factual? Would we want to see Judge Carrozo's email statements?

Expand full comment
27 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?