Consumers Are the Collateral Damage In This War
By Andy Caldwell
The State of California is ramping up its war on oil and agriculture and, as a result, California is heading for some desperate times.
The war on oil includes production, trucking, and consumption. The war on production includes banning fracking, drilling within 3,200 feet from so-called sensitive receptors, and a new bill that allows cities, counties, and voters to outright ban construction of new oil and gas wells in their community. Another law requires gasoline refineries to have enough gasoline on hand to prevent price spikes that can create temporary shortages during the time the plants are shut down to do maintenance. Unless the companies can build enormous storage tanks to store any extra production in advance of the maintenance closure, the new law presents an impossible scenario.
All this begs the question of why any oil company would invest in California?
They won’t.
In fact, many are shutting down operations and leaving California. Because in addition to these restraints on production, the state has also issued various death sentences on the ability to deliver oil by way of banning new pipelines or preventing the repair of existing lines (Sable, formerly Exxon, continues to run the gauntlet of agencies that just want to say no to restarting the Gaviota coast pipeline and plant). The County of SLO blocked the construction of additional rail spurs that ended up causing Phillips 66 to close its Nipomo refinery and convert their gasoline refinery in the Bay Area to biofuels. The county of Santa Barbara has also limited the ability to truck oil which explains why most of the oil production in the Santa Maria Valley has been shut down ever since the Nipomo refinery was shut down. Then we have the closure of two Phillip 66 plants in Los Angeles that have been in production for 100 years for all the aforementioned reasons. Meanwhile, California must now import 75% of the oil it consumes.
California’s War on Agriculture
Of course, the biggest death blow to the future of the industry are the state mandates in effect that will effectively ban natural gas in new construction along with banning the sale of diesel- and gas-powered vehicles in this state. The latter has already caused the largest trucking company in our region to close its business.
The war on fossil fuels affects agriculture because all their equipment runs on diesel. Farmers will have no ability to charge electric vehicles in the middle of a farm field. Moreover, many of the products farmers use to destroy pests and diseases are also derived from fossil fuels, not to mention the fertilizers that help the plants grow vigorously.
This war on agriculture has a new and disturbing component to it. Every county in our state has an Agricultural Commissioner charged with many duties including ensuring that only safe and approved herbicides, pesticides, and fertilizers are used and applied in accordance with the laws that have served to ensure the safest food supply in the world.
However, just a few months ago, the president of the State Association of Ag Commissioners was forced to write a scathing letter to state officials complaining about how environmental justice warriors were tag-teaming with the State Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) in such a manner as to hinder the ability of the ag commissioners to do their job of protecting farmworkers, the public, and the environment through the enforcement of current pesticide laws and regulations.
Specifically, the letter expressed disappointment that DPR continues to cater to these stakeholders that support and facilitate false narratives such as the recent “Toxic Tour” of the Santa Maria Valley that DPR cosponsored with the local activist group CAUSE.
Legislators Mandating Scarcity
Finally, a state law known as SGMA, the State Groundwater Management Act, is a perfect example of the state mandating scarcity rather than creating abundance. The law is causing ag property values to plummet in the state because it is serving to cut off groundwater use for agriculture. The point here is that voters have authorized billions in bond measures to build more dam and reservoir capacity, but nothing has been built. Hence, in the name of managing water, the state is effectively cutting off groundwater supplies to farmers. Need I remind anyone that without water the farmer simply owns a bunch of dirt? Hence, we now have the California dust belt emerging in the San Joaquin Valley which was once the most productive ag land in the world.
How long before consumers figure out that this war on oil, trucking, and farming (not to mention our electricity and water rates), is a war against their very livelihood?
Andy Caldwell, Executive Director, COLAB
Santa Barbara Current’s Endorsement List (Nov 5, 2024 Election)
If “California must now import 75% of the oil it consumes”, will the recent allocation of the oil rich Pacific Ocean along Santa Barbara County as an extension of the Chumash Reserve further limit or increase the potential for oil production? Aren’t Chumash exempt from
County laws and/or ordinances? I vaguely recall decades ago that Chumash agreed as a condition of approval not to use gaming casino proceeds to buy up more County lands but then that treaty or agreement became non binding because recognized indigenous tribes are exempt from restrictions or laws applicable to American non-indigenous … or something like that. It’s all complex.
I’m grateful to you Andy for your concise, condensed articles focused on high priority topics.
Ag restrictions on groundwater use is huge! Thanks for underscoring that again we well-intentioned, emotional (stupid) voters based a major bond for creation of essential water storage — dams—and like always nothing happens. Reminds me of $400M bond passed for shelters for unhoused/ homeless that disappeared into politician owned la la land. Why anyone votes for passage of a CA bond given that they’re never used for their intended purpose is a research study!
Remember the excited passage of Measure D bonds for essential road improvements that somehow became A or something for the millions of approved funding to then be spent on bike lanes and other wasteful projects to restrict or limit vehicles on roads? The County’s Dictate: Anyone who can’t transport their family on a bike, needs to move.
Thank you Andy for sounding multiple alarms for the pending County and State financial disaster. The County’s war on fossil fuels is not only a disaster for consumers but also to our County by way of taxes and royalties. How will the loss to tax base be recuperated from revenues? From weed sales?
The “Chumash Marine Sanctuary Act,” is no more than a land grab and amounts to a cabal with radical environmentalists in the Sierra Club and SurfRider. To give almost 5,000 square miles to a tribe based on race is outrageous! Yes, there is a carve out around Morro Bay in order to facilitate a wind farm! So, basically our federal government has acquiesced federal waters in order to appease radical environmentalists and keep oil production out! Further, when you calculate the number of 501c3 “land trusts” are removed from County tax roles, the amount would easily be hundreds of millions in lost revenue. All when we are at record mass deficits!
To remove our local oil producers is an outrageous, self inflicted wound and to remove oil refineries from the supply chain is foolish and a clear threat to our national security.
What’s next, close Diablo Nuclear Plant? No, it dawned on even Newsom, that our electricity has to come from somewhere!
Yes, leftist activists in our government are not only at war with oil companies but at war with agriculture as well. Go figure, lefty control of not only our energy production, but our food supply as well. What could possibly go wrong? This concerted effort by leftist activists to control our food and energy supply is a classic example of the “enemy from within!”