The very liberal Washington Post had this to say in a recent editorial:
“Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin announced the largest deregulatory action in U.S. history. It’s about time.
“Congress passed the Clean Air Act in 1963 to regulate local pollution around the country, and regulators did that for decades. Then, in 2009, the EPA decided it would treat greenhouse gases like other pollutants, despite their damage being global rather than local.
“That declaration, called the “endangerment finding,” has been used by bureaucrats ever since to dramatically expand the federal government’s power over cars. Now, the EPA will rescind it.
“The U.S. share of global greenhouse gas emissions has been trending downward since the end of World War II, and the 2009 policy change didn’t meaningfully alter its trajectory. Despite the obsession with gas-powered vehicles, light and medium-duty cars and trucks combined to generate just 1.8 percent global greenhouse gas emissions in 2022.
“These emissions continue to rise because the atmosphere does not care which country the gases come from. The EPA has no power over China and India, which are increasing their emissions even as they talk a big game at climate conferences.
“In 2022, the Supreme Court ruled that bureaucrats couldn’t make new rules of ‘vast economic and political significance’ without Congress directly giving away its power.
“More than 20 years ago, the EPA admitted that the Clean Air Act did not directly give them this power, and the estimated $1 trillion cost is undeniably significant.”
Two Key Takeaways
The endangerment finding cost our economy $1 trillion in higher costs to industry, car makers, and, of course, consumers, while accomplishing absolutely nothing. And that $1 trillion estimate doesn’t come close to calculating all the costs, including the loss of jobs in the coal, oil, and gas industries, among others.
And never, in the history of mankind, did we consider carbon dioxide a pollutant.
In fact, every living thing on our planet would die without it.
Of course, all the above is lost on the political and activist classes here in CA, including Santa Barbara County.
Santa Barbara County has spent millions on its “Climate Action” plan, including the installation of solar panels, electric vehicles, charging stations, and soon to come: a battery storage energy system behind the county admin building in Santa Barbara at the corner of Anacapa and Anapamu Streets.
And what do they have to show for their efforts to lower emissions in the county?
Well, I witnessed the shortest briefing ever on that very subject a few weeks ago. That is because the news wasn’t just bad, it was downright catastrophic for those who believe we have little to no time to save our planet.
Specifically, a report to county supervisors on the lack of progress to reduce emissions during the study period of 2018-2023 demonstrated that this entire program was a colossal waste of time, energy, and money.
The Truth of the Matter
“Staff and consultants have prepared a 2023 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory to track progress toward achieving 50% reduction by 2030 (below 2018 levels). Overall, community wide emissions in 2023 were 1% higher than they were in 2018.”
In other words, zero, zilch, nada progress. In fact, we are going in the opposite direction; emissions increased!
Meanwhile, CA has now lost more than 20% of its gasoline refinery capacity. Expect prices to explode at the pump. Yet, again, however, the rules, regs, and fines, that caused refiners to leave CA at great cost to them (Valero gladly lost $1 billion to get out as fast as they could) will accomplish nothing for the environment as we begin to import gasoline from half-way around the world (South Korea and India).
The war on oil will now prove to be a war on consumers. The political and activist class couldn’t be happier however, as they have always sought this type of financial leverage on consumers to force them into electric vehicles, which of course they won’t be able to afford either.
Andy Caldwell, Executive Director, COLAB
*****
Please help spread the word about the value and readability of SBCurrent.com by sharing this article with friends and neighbors. Use the button below or copy the URL to share, ensuring they too stay well-informed. Thank you.
****
Community Calendar:
Got a Santa Barbara event for our community calendar? Fenkner@sbcurrent.com
The people who want to close State Street to all vehicle traffic and require us to get around by foot, bike, rickshaw or billy goat are the same people who want to shut down our energy sector and hamstring our economy.
Yes, this mentality requires a different level of stupid. It is amazing to me, the number on the left that are actively rooting against our country and the ability to turn on our lights and power our industries.
Where are the environmentalists jumping up and down about the thousands of metric tons of debris being burned into the atmosphere from smoldering forest fires resulting from nonexistent forest management? Or how about the raw sewage being allowed to enter our creeks and rivers from homeless encampments?
Just curious as to how the money flows between environmental groups like the EDC, Sierra Club and Surfrider and our local and state governments?
Can anyone imagine the economic juggernaut here in California that would be unleashed if our energy policy allowed the responsible harvesting of fossil fuels and the use of nuclear power?
Again, “environmentalists” continue to root against our economy and the American people, all while taking our tax dollars from NGO’s!
A, thank you for reporting about the actual results of our highly touted Climate Action plan. I would love to read more across our relatively thin media ecosystem although I strongly suspect it will go unreported. Spending is easy but tying it to positive results, well, not so much (e.g., homelessness, education, etc.). Thank you!