It’s a lot worse than that, SC justices have been making annual treks to foreign countries for speaking engagements and raking in millions for decades now…SC got issues…
The Democratic Party is completely void of ideas and policies to help Americans. This is the reason they tried to import 20+ million illegally into the US and then cater to their every need once they got here. They have only one recourse against President Trump and his vision to restore the United States and that is to judge shop to find friendly districts to try and slow his progress down. My greatest hope is that the Supreme Court fast tracks all of these and restores the rule of law promptly.
Justice Jackson’s descent was just another glaring example of how the left displays open distain for America and it’s founding documents and the main reason that President Biden or should I say his shadow handlers chose her.
That's why Trump has said everything has to be done by the book.
The Democrats cry,shout and protest that everything is done illegally
I think they don't even know what legal is at this point because they have no idea what that means and the last administration certainly didn't lead the Country by the book.
Don't worry President Trump does everything according to the law,not the Democratic rule,but by the Constitution.
Otherwise he wouldn't be winning any of the cases,if you didn't realize that. All the cases that have been brought against him by Biden and Obama judges have benn rules in his favor by the Supreme Court
And if you didn't take a civics course in school, the Constitution is the law that we follow in the United States of America and the ultimate rule over any court.
Except for taco, he believes the law doesn’t apply to him so he doesn’t follow it. It doesn’t help that 6 out of 9 justices on the Supreme Court are in his pocket.
I know he reduced it, by 1.9 trillion. OK it’s revenue for the country but what is done with it. does it just sit in the bank and gain interest, is it used for the needy is taco gambling with it? what’s done with it?
Unfortunately, Sotomayor, Barrett and Jackson have done nothing but set back feminism. They embody every reason ever given as to why there should be a glass ceiling.
The recent rule of Gaia has had fair hearing. Verdict: 100% wonting. She/her/it was a false god/goddess. Back to ancient basics, the sky god and the earth goddess. May they stay out of each other's realms, but rather revere each other with new eyes.
I read this Judiciary Article titled "Imperial Judiciary?" By Brent E. Zepke, Esq. I quote from same about Zpeke's article on Judicial Arrogance and Departure from the Essential
Requirements of the law> "According to Google, “a hubristic person is characterized by excessive pride, arrogance, and an overestimation of their own abilities and importance. This can lead to disregard for others’ opinion, a belief that they are above the rules and a tendency to make poor decisions, often with negative consequences for themselves and those around them.”
Any problems with Santa Barbara Judicial Officers, how about Life-Time-Banned Judge Michael Carrozzo?, Judge Adams? Any other SB Judges?
Are the SB Courts Concealing Anything may we all ask?
Is Bonnie Bells "WHERE'S JOE HOLLAND" related to the SB Courts?
Ketanji Jackson Browne. Form over substance...the very essence of DEI.
Since Biden's racist and bigoted announcement that his nominee for the Court would necessarily would be a Black woman (KJB unable to define), does that indicate she is the very best that America has to offer in that regard? Of course not. However, by precluding potential jurists who were even marginally moderate, Biden ironically damaged the image of a Black female jurist going forward. A fundamental understanding of the Constitution was clearly not a criteria for Biden...a truism for his unfortunate and devastating tenure.
Biden, in his own words, put her on the court solely for her skin color symbolism. She therefore is what she is. She was chosen to speak for her gender and race. Thus, she speaks.
On the other hand, it is good to have this caliber of a dissenting voice on SCOTUS. This way all dimensions of the issues get a fair hearing, leading to better and more universally sound final judgements.
We should know what a one-party echo chamber looks like in Santa Barbara, so welcome Ms Jackson-Brown. Give us your best shot, in the spirit of fulsome debate.
Great Review…I believe that the SC is compromised, with maybe 3-4 strict constitutional justices…BUT, the day of reckoning is fast approaching…great time to be alive…
Even if you do not like Mr. Zepke's positions he has clearly called out arrogance.
Does this sound familiar: "On May 22, 2025, United States District Judge Susan Illston, a Clinton nominee...." Clinton? Ah it was a Clinton newbie judge who sequestered a lawsuit over the State of Calif. election that required documentation (voted for by a serious majority of Hispanic US born citizens of Calif.)
"...restructuring of the Federal Government (the likes of which have historically required Congress’s approval...." Uh, there are 3 branches of government "intentionally" created by the Founding Fathers after watching the Confederate States crumble (not civil war).
How about this one.... "...casually discarding 55 pages of evidence-based lower court reasoning…” Guess what boys and girls should "we the people" buy this narrow minded statement?
As a grad student I researched over 300 articles. Proudly presented them in my draft to my committee. With one stroke of a pen months of work was wiped out by the statement there was a flaw in most of the quoted work. I swallowed hard, asked what the problem was and had to admit the graduate department overseer's were correct. This Justice cannot seem to get her personal prejudice out of the way.
This comes under the heading of "Too bad, so Sad." Oh and where once again was this now disposed ruling? Once again the "Ninth Circuit" that is jammed with political operatives who want so badly to "create law" from the bench.
I'll end with Mr. Zepke's conclusion ... Justice Amy Barrett wrote in Trump v CASA, No. 24A884, “Justice Jackson decries an Imperial Executive while embracing an Imperial Judiciary.”
An excellent and very well presented article. Putting aside my 48 year legal career, I am rather bemused at the current leftist actions considering their darling President Clinton fired roughly 335,000 federal employees within his first 4 months in office. No one in Congress or Courts complained. And, I sadly add, the California judiciary on all levels has rotted away with DEI judges who have risen from progressive socialist educations and public law practice. Thus, I am contentedly retired and constantly bewildered.
I’m Trump's BIGGEST fan, and love how he cuts thru the crap to get a job done, but in this case Justice Jackson might have a valid point of concern.
Without reading it, Executive Order 14210 sounds awfully broad - “. . . mandating a “critical transformation” of the Federal Government by “eliminating or consolidating” existing agencies and ordering agency heads to “promptly undertake preparations to initiate large-scale reductions in force.”
If EO 14210 can be implemented by executive decree, who knows what authority this could confer on the next President who might be as stupid as Biden.
Yes, we might need to worry a successor would try something as sweeping as a federal worker experimental clot shot mandate.
Telling federal workers, you do have a choice. You can choose to quit, if you don't want to take this shot. Caution indeed is in order. These things could happen here too.
Really? That’s your argument, that Biden didn’t choose the right people for the job? You are aware of who taco chose for his administration, right? Let’s start with Hegseth. He was in the military, So were millions of other men. He’s a drunk, a sexual predator, a liar, and a butt kisser. He’s firing women who are generals, heads of departments and why because they’re women he’s doing the same with generals and other high officials in the military, he’s firing or demoting them because they’re black, and in place he’s putting in less qualified white man. He texted classified information to a reporter, his wife and his brother-in-law.
Rubio, Secretary of State, who has no experience in foreign affairs, and seldom says a word about anything. Bondi, Who is acting more like his personal lawyer than the AG and the United States of America. Vance, VP, again no experience, no manners, rude and uncouth. The dog killer, secretary of homeland security, likes to dress up and have her picture taken, is cruel and heartless. Has a nonworking brain. Gabbard, secretary of intelligence, that is an oxymoron, doesn’t have any, and she’s a Russian asset. McMahon, Secretary of education, she was the owner of the WWE. Wow, can’t tell AI from A1. RFK, jr, secretary of health, that’s a joke just looking at him. Then there’s Homan, Patel and the list goes on.
I believe he said that before he hired her. That it would be a black woman I believe. he didn’t believe like a lot of people that if you’re DEI, you are not as knowledgeable or superior as the white people.
She errs. Requiring the status quo of a massively bloated government is not sacrosanct, nor protected under any reading of the US Constitution.
Justice Jackson-Brown is now a jurist; not a government employee union activist. She proves herself notoriously unfit for the task.
# 46 -Joseph Robinette Biden: the toxic gift to this country that keeps on giving.
The “Biden” team cared nothing about equality, just wanted to destroy America.
YES! ‘The 16-Year Plan’ to destroy America was [their] long play, beginning with Obama, but Trump got elected & stepped into the breach…
Anons have known for some time, Great to see others coming to the Truth!
https://qalerts.app/?q=%5BThe+16+Year+Plan+To+Destroy+America%5D
https://x.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1154112475002036234?s=61
https://x.com/scottadamssays/status/1946536547035292113?s=61
# 106 Supreme Court Justice Clarence, Willard Thomas;
The toxic gift that keeps on taking.
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4708390-thomas-has-accepted-4m-in-gifts-during-career-watchdog/mlite/amp/
Intertesting. Now what do you think about Browne's competence as a SC jurist to date...and why?
And that someone poisoned him and almost killed him. He is the best on that court.
It’s a lot worse than that, SC justices have been making annual treks to foreign countries for speaking engagements and raking in millions for decades now…SC got issues…
https://newrepublic.com/post/172304/congress-known-john-robertss-wifes-shady-financial-dealings-months
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4891713-roberts-scandal-supreme-court/
And Biden. How do you think he ended up with millions at the end of his prez. When he only makes 200k a year.
The Democratic Party is completely void of ideas and policies to help Americans. This is the reason they tried to import 20+ million illegally into the US and then cater to their every need once they got here. They have only one recourse against President Trump and his vision to restore the United States and that is to judge shop to find friendly districts to try and slow his progress down. My greatest hope is that the Supreme Court fast tracks all of these and restores the rule of law promptly.
Justice Jackson’s descent was just another glaring example of how the left displays open distain for America and it’s founding documents and the main reason that President Biden or should I say his shadow handlers chose her.
That's why Trump has said everything has to be done by the book.
The Democrats cry,shout and protest that everything is done illegally
I think they don't even know what legal is at this point because they have no idea what that means and the last administration certainly didn't lead the Country by the book.
Taco may have said that everything else to be done by the book, but it would be nice if he at least read the book.
Don't worry President Trump does everything according to the law,not the Democratic rule,but by the Constitution.
Otherwise he wouldn't be winning any of the cases,if you didn't realize that. All the cases that have been brought against him by Biden and Obama judges have benn rules in his favor by the Supreme Court
And if you didn't take a civics course in school, the Constitution is the law that we follow in the United States of America and the ultimate rule over any court.
Except for taco, he believes the law doesn’t apply to him so he doesn’t follow it. It doesn’t help that 6 out of 9 justices on the Supreme Court are in his pocket.
The same sentiment was felt the last 4 years.
Sorry, that’s like apples and oranges.
Brown's dissent projects the descent of America.
Agree.
Well either they tried or they did import “20,000,000 immigrants”. They knew the tariffs were coming so they had to hurry up and get that done.
Tarriffs have brought in a surplus for this county. They are working as they were intended to do.
Yep
What is the intention? Surplus for what? It sure isn’t to help the needy.
To bring in revenue for the country. Is 26 billion for one month not good enough for you. Do you know the debt JB left for us?
I know he reduced it, by 1.9 trillion. OK it’s revenue for the country but what is done with it. does it just sit in the bank and gain interest, is it used for the needy is taco gambling with it? what’s done with it?
😂
Unfortunately, Sotomayor, Barrett and Jackson have done nothing but set back feminism. They embody every reason ever given as to why there should be a glass ceiling.
The recent rule of Gaia has had fair hearing. Verdict: 100% wonting. She/her/it was a false god/goddess. Back to ancient basics, the sky god and the earth goddess. May they stay out of each other's realms, but rather revere each other with new eyes.
Yes.
So you think Sotomayor , Barrett and Jackson have set feminism back? Your comment has pushed women back to second class citizens.
I read this Judiciary Article titled "Imperial Judiciary?" By Brent E. Zepke, Esq. I quote from same about Zpeke's article on Judicial Arrogance and Departure from the Essential
Requirements of the law> "According to Google, “a hubristic person is characterized by excessive pride, arrogance, and an overestimation of their own abilities and importance. This can lead to disregard for others’ opinion, a belief that they are above the rules and a tendency to make poor decisions, often with negative consequences for themselves and those around them.”
Any problems with Santa Barbara Judicial Officers, how about Life-Time-Banned Judge Michael Carrozzo?, Judge Adams? Any other SB Judges?
Are the SB Courts Concealing Anything may we all ask?
Is Bonnie Bells "WHERE'S JOE HOLLAND" related to the SB Courts?
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-judges-misconduct/
https://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-judges-discipline-20150404-story.html
https://juliemandersonholburn.substack.com/p/whistleblowers-reveal-corruption
Howard Walther, Member of a Military Family
A power-hungry Nitwit. An example of DEI. Unfortunately for the nation, with a lifetime appointment.
Ketanji Jackson Browne. Form over substance...the very essence of DEI.
Since Biden's racist and bigoted announcement that his nominee for the Court would necessarily would be a Black woman (KJB unable to define), does that indicate she is the very best that America has to offer in that regard? Of course not. However, by precluding potential jurists who were even marginally moderate, Biden ironically damaged the image of a Black female jurist going forward. A fundamental understanding of the Constitution was clearly not a criteria for Biden...a truism for his unfortunate and devastating tenure.
Biden, in his own words, put her on the court solely for her skin color symbolism. She therefore is what she is. She was chosen to speak for her gender and race. Thus, she speaks.
I wonder if she feels like a token?
I would guess she feels like a lottery winner.
On the other hand, it is good to have this caliber of a dissenting voice on SCOTUS. This way all dimensions of the issues get a fair hearing, leading to better and more universally sound final judgements.
We should know what a one-party echo chamber looks like in Santa Barbara, so welcome Ms Jackson-Brown. Give us your best shot, in the spirit of fulsome debate.
Great Review…I believe that the SC is compromised, with maybe 3-4 strict constitutional justices…BUT, the day of reckoning is fast approaching…great time to be alive…
https://x.com/thenotoriouslmc/status/1946584727441326411?s=61
PS…good time to go back & review the pretext for the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax…time to bring back Durham?
https://www.justice.gov/archives/media/1381211/dl
A DEI hire of the Supreme Court,that rules by personal opinions and feelings rather than by the law. We don't care what her opinion is.
If that is the law,then so be it. That's why she was appointed to rule by the law.
Bravo.... Encore!!!
Even if you do not like Mr. Zepke's positions he has clearly called out arrogance.
Does this sound familiar: "On May 22, 2025, United States District Judge Susan Illston, a Clinton nominee...." Clinton? Ah it was a Clinton newbie judge who sequestered a lawsuit over the State of Calif. election that required documentation (voted for by a serious majority of Hispanic US born citizens of Calif.)
"...restructuring of the Federal Government (the likes of which have historically required Congress’s approval...." Uh, there are 3 branches of government "intentionally" created by the Founding Fathers after watching the Confederate States crumble (not civil war).
How about this one.... "...casually discarding 55 pages of evidence-based lower court reasoning…” Guess what boys and girls should "we the people" buy this narrow minded statement?
As a grad student I researched over 300 articles. Proudly presented them in my draft to my committee. With one stroke of a pen months of work was wiped out by the statement there was a flaw in most of the quoted work. I swallowed hard, asked what the problem was and had to admit the graduate department overseer's were correct. This Justice cannot seem to get her personal prejudice out of the way.
This comes under the heading of "Too bad, so Sad." Oh and where once again was this now disposed ruling? Once again the "Ninth Circuit" that is jammed with political operatives who want so badly to "create law" from the bench.
I'll end with Mr. Zepke's conclusion ... Justice Amy Barrett wrote in Trump v CASA, No. 24A884, “Justice Jackson decries an Imperial Executive while embracing an Imperial Judiciary.”
DEI at its most ridiculous level.
An excellent and very well presented article. Putting aside my 48 year legal career, I am rather bemused at the current leftist actions considering their darling President Clinton fired roughly 335,000 federal employees within his first 4 months in office. No one in Congress or Courts complained. And, I sadly add, the California judiciary on all levels has rotted away with DEI judges who have risen from progressive socialist educations and public law practice. Thus, I am contentedly retired and constantly bewildered.
Hubristic, perfect word to describe taco, and some of the commentators here, too. Also, some of these comments sound a bit racist.
What has been said that is racism?
Always the card they play
I’m Trump's BIGGEST fan, and love how he cuts thru the crap to get a job done, but in this case Justice Jackson might have a valid point of concern.
Without reading it, Executive Order 14210 sounds awfully broad - “. . . mandating a “critical transformation” of the Federal Government by “eliminating or consolidating” existing agencies and ordering agency heads to “promptly undertake preparations to initiate large-scale reductions in force.”
If EO 14210 can be implemented by executive decree, who knows what authority this could confer on the next President who might be as stupid as Biden.
Yes, we might need to worry a successor would try something as sweeping as a federal worker experimental clot shot mandate.
Telling federal workers, you do have a choice. You can choose to quit, if you don't want to take this shot. Caution indeed is in order. These things could happen here too.
Guess there might be a reason for a new protest.
There were a lot of people citing DEI. What did they mean by that?
Diversity,Equity, Inclusion. Biden didn't choose the best candidate he choose on that fit in that category.
Really? That’s your argument, that Biden didn’t choose the right people for the job? You are aware of who taco chose for his administration, right? Let’s start with Hegseth. He was in the military, So were millions of other men. He’s a drunk, a sexual predator, a liar, and a butt kisser. He’s firing women who are generals, heads of departments and why because they’re women he’s doing the same with generals and other high officials in the military, he’s firing or demoting them because they’re black, and in place he’s putting in less qualified white man. He texted classified information to a reporter, his wife and his brother-in-law.
Rubio, Secretary of State, who has no experience in foreign affairs, and seldom says a word about anything. Bondi, Who is acting more like his personal lawyer than the AG and the United States of America. Vance, VP, again no experience, no manners, rude and uncouth. The dog killer, secretary of homeland security, likes to dress up and have her picture taken, is cruel and heartless. Has a nonworking brain. Gabbard, secretary of intelligence, that is an oxymoron, doesn’t have any, and she’s a Russian asset. McMahon, Secretary of education, she was the owner of the WWE. Wow, can’t tell AI from A1. RFK, jr, secretary of health, that’s a joke just looking at him. Then there’s Homan, Patel and the list goes on.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/the-inside-story-of-how-biden-promised-to-appoint-a-black-woman-to-the-supreme-court-192146779.html.
Those are your opinions and not factual information. Biden himself said why he hired her.
I believe he said that before he hired her. That it would be a black woman I believe. he didn’t believe like a lot of people that if you’re DEI, you are not as knowledgeable or superior as the white people.
You're trying to twist yourself into a pretzel to prove otherwise but the fact is he was only going to hire a Black Female Candidate.
The proof is there. That is what DEI is.
https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/politics/biden-interviews-trio-of-candidates-for-supreme-court/3566791/.
No one said that but she was hired for race and gender. He didn't even interview any other candidates.
And you've stated he did say that before. So we agree.
So your point on" white people" .... is irrelevant because she was a DEI hire.