Santa Barbara Current

Santa Barbara Current

Legal Perspective

The Scourge of Mail-In Voting (Part 2)

By Brent E. Zepke, Esq.

Sep 23, 2026
∙ Paid

On September 14, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court in United States Postal Service, et al v. State of California, et al, upheld the nationwide preliminary injunction that prohibited the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) from implementing its regulations to ensure that only mail-in ballots from live citizens who are registered to vote are counted in the Mid-Term election in November.

The unsigned opinion provided “The Government is unlikely to succeed on the merits of its challenge to the District Court’s preliminary injunction. And the equitable factors applicable for obtaining emergency relief from this Court do not favor a stay.”

It is unsettling that the Supreme Court used just 35-words centering on “equitable factors” rather than on legal ones.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Santa Barbara Current to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Santa Barbara Current · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture