Thank you, Brian. While I won’t end a friendship over someone voting yes on 50 (although I’ve had friends end theirs with me over it and my own Substack today is about how friendship should not be ruined by politics) — I wish the people in this beautiful state would wake up from their dream of still being a young hippie Democrat in the 60s and 70s, giving it to The Man and celebrating peace, love and understanding. Because we ain’t there anymore. That dream was co-opted and turned into a nightmare. If you want peace, love and understanding and true democracy - vote NO on Prop 50!
Get the NO Voters out. https://abev.optiqdata.com/. Update on Prop 50 ballot return: D+22.8%/ only a 13% voter turnout thus far.
Ballot % registered as compared to % of returned:
50.9% Dem 14.7%
26.1% GOP 14.4%
21.1% NPP 9.1%
White non Hispanic are 57% of registeted, returning 68% of returned ballots thusfar.
As one reader posted “Proposition 50, if passed, will end any pretense of democracy in California for generations to come. The exodus from this state will become an avalanche of companies and people, as taxes and regulations increase when taxpayers leave. What will be left of California, as a once prosperous state, I leave to your imagination.”
Polly please post link to your mentioned article on this topic.
Thank you, Montecito. Interesting. I must add I was perplexed by you telling me I was harsh towards Elaine yesterday. She attacked me first, calling my comment repulsive. I do believe in free speech and I wrote my Substack this morning about how I don't believe in ending friendships over politics: https://pollysnewsletter.substack.com/p/whats-politics-got-to-do-with-friendship
But you, like Dan O Siebert criticize me as hateful and harsh but you say nothing to Elaine who was actually hateful and harsh to me first. I'm not supposed to defend myself? I truly don't understand why you dislike me. I come here and politely comment. My comments are popular, so not everyone agrees with you. But really, I have the right to say f off to someone who insults me.
Elaine represents herself well in her posts as both ignorant and stupid. She’s unable to articulate her anger beyond name calling and repeating platitudes. Missives. Words. I get attacked frequently and consider the source. Is it worth responding? Sticks & stones break bones…. Defend against those who matter.
I welcome every dissenting post on SB Current from informed people who help me think, motivate me to research deeper. There are usually 2-sides to every story but as yet, Elaine falls short.
Thank you, Montecito and I agree. But I comment on other Substacks, like Absurdistan, Coffee & Covid and my friend Jim Kunstler's Clusterfuck Nation and never get this kind of Elaine or Julia Gonzalez ignorant venom - and these Substacks routinely get hundreds of comments and the last comment I did on Absurdistan got something like 90 likes. So, on the one hand I admire SB Current for being open but I don't like idiots getting the last word and that idiotic last word being what a visitor takes away.
Wow! I got a shout out from Polly! Even though she spelled my name wrong, and it was more of an insult, But then, that’s Polly’s style. If you agree with her it’s sunshine and flowers, if not watch out. It makes me happy I occupy a part of your headspace.
I agree Polly. This reflects a change in political discourse over the last several years. In the old days I could have spirited arguments with friends and have a drink afterwards. Just like the old-time politicians.
It continually blows (what remains of) my mind that so many Californians seem oblivious to the damage Newsom and company continue to perpetrate on our beloved state.
Excellent recap of stats Brian. I completely concur, we celebrate for NO KINGS every July 4th, Thank you God!
The Left hate DJT so much, that creating a ballroom at the WH has unhinged them, even though not one penny is paid for by the US Government. Imagine that! Someone in the WH who works for no pay, who donates his own funds for improvements, and flag poles, and the myriad of other things he does, and the Left hates him. Their NO KINGS March was like a bunch of old white haired kids protesting because they lost.
Let's celebrate peace in 7 nations under Pres. Trump, the end to NGO's stealing tax payers funds, and small sizing the government, not to mention justice to the false Russian hoax and weaponizing the DOJ on one man, for 10 years. Let's see some justice!
No Kings had nothing to do with the election. It is a response to the power grab, the total disregard for the Constitution, the destruction of the balance of power that has kept this country from becoming a dictatorship, the cruelty of the implementation of the immigration policy (which most people agree with…criminals, drug traffickers etc), the vengeance and revenge for anyone who crosses “him”, the destruction of much of what makes us competitive (scientific research, education (always in need of reform) for example), the greedy lining of his own pockets and those of his cohorts and the reckless disregard for people in need who they are harming the most. I’ll say again, that we have deep problems in this country which need to be addressed. The Democrats did a piss poor job in so many ways. So did the Republicans in the past. We need a serious re-boot. But….the MEANS DO NOT JUSTIFY THE ENDS. That’s what the protests are about. I’m suggesting you try to see that. There is more agreement on what’s been wrong in the country than you think…I think. Finding and fueling more ways to be divided is not going to move the needle. You may not believe this (Polly certainly won’t) but I’m trying to listen and understand even as i disagree. You might want to do the same.
Elaine, So, because President Biden opened the border to more than ten million unvetted people, gave them cell phones, cash, hotel rooms, and the ability to work, all of which were against the laws of the United States (passed by a bi-partisan Congress), those people should now be given a free pass to stay and to continue to suck off the teat of the welfare mother state? Forever? How many and how much of that can we taxpayers take before we are all destitute? The only way the U.S. remains the last great hope of mankind is to retain its wealth and its strength. By giving it all away – which is what Biden and his minions were doing – we'd end up like the rich uncle who was so generous he drove himself into poverty. The optics of ICE agents and other law enforcement agencies pushing into crowds of "protestors" does sway the uninformed and, of course, the leftists and anarchists trying to bring the country down, but it's all agitprop: spit in an ICE agent's face until he reacts and then film the reaction and cry "police brutality." It often works, but it's all just theater.
No Kings is a stupid moniker for what is nothing more than a temper tantrum over losing an election and a fear of losing governent benefits. Kings are born into royalty, not elected. Truly, all of your objections to Trump are merely projection. The vengence of lawfare against Trump, the abandonment of real science during covid for an aurhoritarian response with nazi character. Lining pockets with ten percent for the big guy. You should try to understand the corruption in the Democrat party rather than blindly regurgitating talking points from The View
Insults don’t move the needle either. There is plenty of corruption in all of government. Call it a temper tantrum if that makes you feel superior or more adult-like. It doesn’t change what half the country finds offensive…and the degradation of the office of the Presidency is a starting point. Guessing you think the gold covered ballroom is a great investment as the government is shut down. Ah…just another detail in a very big picture.
Trump was heard to have said of the White House, "This place reminds me of a cheap pair of pants, no ballroom" Trump is paying for the improvement with his own money and donations.
Bull…I don’t believe he’s spending a dime of his own money and….he’s turning the White House into HIS (garish) house, in HIS image. It has been a symbol as the People’s House. Gone because of his narcissistic ego.
You can't win with these pinheads. It is true that all presidents make changes to the White House but what sets Trump apart is that he is not using taxpayer dollars but his own and donations. You might say that it is garrish and a reflection of a repulsive character but, other presidents garrish self expression was at taxpayers expense and that is what I find repulsive.
His wealth has increased by 3 BILLION $ since he’s become president and moved 118 spots up on the wealthiest list. He doesn’t need a salary. He gets tributes from his subjects.
Yes, I’m aware all new presidents are given a budget to design and make the home comfortable for them, not to do a complete reconstruction, and if they did want to i’m sure they would’ve gotten it done the right way through Congress, which is the way it supposed to be done and not start tearing things down before they’ve even presented a plan to Congress or have permits or anything else legally. I am also aware that Mar-a-Lago was his home before he was president, which is why I’m saying he’ll rename the WH Mar-a-Lago North, because he doesn’t plan to leave. Do you remember Nixon’s place in California in San Clemente? He referred to it as the western White House.
To those mocking for redesigning the White House with his own money don't forget that
Hillary Clinton took all the furniture in the White House when Bills Term was over. That was bought by the people and owned by the people not the Clintons.
Hillary Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, faced controversy for taking about $28,000 worth of furnishings from the White House when they left office in 2001.
Or possibly pay with his $250M lawsuit against DoJ which coincidentally is the projected cost of the ballroom. Trump stated of approved he’d donate to ‘charity or even the ballroom’.
Offer specific examples Elaine: "lining of his own pockets", "scientific research", "education"...etc. Offer up specific identifiable examples, not obtuse general accusations. Bring something to the table...as if you are making a case to jury...provable details...not emotional partisan gibberish wound licking. For example, if you cite a specific situation where a program, etc was cut...explain what was the program, what is successful, why taxpayers should pay for it and the net result of the cut both fiscally and socially. Be serious please.
I think your questionee does not particularly want good debate, nor she does she want to "listen and understand" as she professes. She wants everyone to agree with her. She has a few big government promoters on The Current to agree with her tiresome rhetoric and for sure she is living in a town that depends on big government. So, your sentiments of her wanting to be serious is like spitting in the wind.
No they are not. They are definitely total against one person in the White House. They don't like far right policies and prefer far left. The speakers at the protestors were only there to promote those policies.
Mostly only Seniors,No minorities or young people.
Same people who protested and treated our Vietnam Vets so bad when they returned home.
Sponsored by 6 very wealthy Billionaires to the tune of $249 million.
Every organization in the poster was a Communist group,even CNN reported that.
Sorry…but this is not true. Were you there? The effort was promoted by a group called Indivisible…which started as an effort to bring people together. It is now more of a movement to allow the other half of the country a voice. I don’t know ANYONE who wants a one part system other than the current Republicans in office.
Other half a voice??? Did you not vote in the 2024 elections and have your voice then. It's not the Republicans fault that you had a terrible candidate that was installed and not elected. It's not the Republicans fault that the Dems have no policies besides Hate Trump. Libs always had a voice now they just want everyone to hear because they are sore losers.
If you search Indivisible that's what they want. They also call this administration facists throughout their web page.Georeg Soros a being donor to Indivisible. Indivisibles worth in 2023 was $12 dollars. They are also Tax exempt calimed as 501 4c on their tax documents. Yet we all have to pay taxes. I wasn't there but tax documents show who funded it. Also the fliers handed out have all the organizations that sponsor and they are all communists groups.
The truth is hard to swallow sometimes. They have you to believe one thing and not another. But in Reality Indivisible and other groups are causing harm to our democracy. A total PsychOp
Do your home Elaine...who funds Indivisible...??? Then lookup what other demonstrations and efforts they have funded. GM is correct. Do not be afraid to look at verifiable facts.
Some of your posts get a number of likes, which is great. I'm a little surprised that they do not post themselves and offer some form of support..
I'm still awaiting your response to my earlier post about supplying some data about your blanket charges against conservatives and Republicans, etc. It was a reasonable request... hopefully you're assembling that because it would be helpful to read it… absent opinion, of course. There is plenty of that to go around on all sides..
Incorrect that CNN said 'every organization was a commie group'. But they did say thatthe Communist Party USA’s logo was included among the listed sponsors.
that's not what I heard but I'm not gonna argue and I know for a fact several organizations were on the list of sponsors I saw the list including CPUSA the Communist Party of the USA.
I actually think if you go to the No Kings Web site you can see the list
From Chat…Below is a balanced, factual summary of key actions by Donald Trump that legal scholars, courts, or government watchdogs have argued violated (or came close to violating) the U.S. Constitution.
It doesn’t include ordinary political controversies — only events with constitutional implications.
⸻
⚖️ 1. Emoluments Clause Concerns
Clause involved: Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses (Article I, Section 9; Article II, Section 1)
Issue: The Constitution prohibits federal officials from receiving payments or benefits (“emoluments”) from foreign states or the U.S. government outside their official salary.
• Trump retained ownership of his business empire while in office, including hotels and properties patronized by foreign governments and lobbyists.
• Multiple lawsuits alleged this violated the Constitution because foreign governments (e.g., from Saudi Arabia, China) spent money at Trump hotels while seeking to influence U.S. policy.
• Courts dismissed some cases on procedural grounds (such as standing), but no court ruled that his behavior was fully constitutional either.
⸻
🏛️ 2. Attempts to Overturn the 2020 Election
Clauses involved: Article II (Electoral Process), 12th Amendment, and the peaceful transfer of power principle
• After losing the 2020 election, Trump and his allies pressured state officials (e.g., Georgia Secretary of State) to “find votes,” encouraged false electors, and pressured the Vice President to reject certified results.
• The January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol followed a rally in which Trump urged supporters to “fight like hell.”
• The House of Representatives impeached him for “incitement of insurrection,” arguing he violated his constitutional duty to uphold the law and facilitate a peaceful transfer of power.
• Several federal and state indictments (as of 2024–2025) allege that these efforts were part of a conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding — an act inconsistent with his constitutional oath.
⸻
📜 3. Obstruction of Congress
Clause involved: Separation of Powers
• During investigations (especially the Mueller investigation and later House oversight inquiries), Trump instructed aides and agencies not to comply with subpoenas.
• The House Judiciary Committee and constitutional scholars argued this obstructed Congress’s oversight authority, which is derived from its constitutional role.
• The House impeached Trump in 2019 for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress (over the Ukraine matter).
⸻
🇺🇸 4. Freedom of the Press & Speech Concerns
Clause involved: First Amendment
• Trump repeatedly called the press “the enemy of the people,” threatened to revoke broadcast licenses, and sought to block publication of books or leaks.
• While rhetoric alone isn’t unconstitutional, critics argue such threats from a sitting president undermine First Amendment protections by chilling free expression.
• He also blocked critics on Twitter from his official @realDonaldTrump account.
• In Knight First Amendment Institute v. Trump (2019), a federal appeals court ruled this violated the First Amendment because the account functioned as a public forum.
⸻
🧾 5. Misuse of Federal Funds (Ukraine Affair)
Clause involved: Impoundment Control Act & the Take Care Clause (Article II)
• In 2019, Trump withheld congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine while pressuring its president to investigate Joe Biden.
• The Government Accountability Office (GAO) found this violated federal law, and constitutional scholars argued it breached the president’s duty to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed.”
⸻
🧠 6. Potential 14th Amendment Issues (Post-Jan 6)
Clause involved: Section 3 of the 14th Amendment
• This clause bars anyone who has “engaged in insurrection” after taking an oath to the Constitution from holding office again.
• Several states and lawsuits have sought to disqualify Trump under this clause, though the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that only Congress has enforcement power over it (2024 ruling).
⸻
✅ To Be Clear
• Many of these issues were challenged but not all were definitively resolved in court.
• Trump was acquitted in both impeachment trials, meaning the Senate did not convict him.
• Still, multiple bipartisan legal experts (from the Federalist Society to liberal scholars) agree that several of these actions tested or violated constitutional norms, even if not criminally adjudicated.
When asked, Democrats could not explain what policy qualifies Trump as a king. Rather, Democrats are creatures of conformity and follow their party's cues without question. It is a strategy of the weak of character and the weak of mind. Democrats like to work for the government where success is measured by conformity rather than achievement. Democrats value conformity to party over all else.
I really enjoyed the memes with Trump wearing his faux crown. The fighter jet flyover the no Kings rally dumping bovine feces was particularly special. Reminds me of him driving the trash truck and serving up fries at Mc Donald’s. The Dems are so easily lampooned.
Mr. Campbell..... why would you list provable facts?
Isn't the story telling of the other side enough entertainment?
When they state RHNA after it was passed not constitutional under the State and continue it proves what you have stated.
It is not about Kings it is about power. The State is in a downward plunge with debt and unsustainable policies. The real producers are leaving which leaves who? (time to play Taps)
Does anyone remember the last twice elected Republican President, George W. Bush? I sure do. Remember when the treasonous left accused Bush of being Mein Fuhrer? All right after a cataclysmic attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon.
This what the left does EVERY TIME there is a Republican in the White House. Mass demonstrations, slandering of our leaders and those who support them, (ie you and me.). This is all business as usual for the left, name calling, bullying, intimidation, threats of violence, boycotts, sit-ins, calls for investigations, all in a coordinated effort to change the results of an election that we the people have already decided.
How does this end? What will be the outcome when a significant population is clearly mentally challenged? Ironically, those yelling the loudest seem to be white, liberal women. Why?
If I had to guess, the left is reacting to their loss of control. In the meantime, normal people have had enough of the perverted left and the never ending calls for subsidies, hand outs, rights which never existed and acknowledgment of a fantasy, make believe world. All whereby the government provides for any and all needs, freedom to be who and what one wants (gender, farm animals etc.) and recognition of disenfranchised people of color, complete with reparations for past deeds committed by the white majority.
These people will never be satisfied with the goodness of our country, no matter who is in charge, their sickness will not allow them to be happy, law abiding, productive members of society.
I started my own journey into "conservatism" when GW Bush was re-elected. As a card-carrying Democrat at the time I was stunned at GW Bush's re-election. Who were these people who could not see what an incompetent fraud he was. (Sound familiar?).
So I started looking into who were these people I was now forced to spend the next four years living with. That is when I learned they loved their country, felt their families, value system and religious foundations that have long been drivers of the American Dream, were under attack by Big Government.
They simply wanted to hold on to all that they lived and cherished. They were not sinister, evil, backwards, reactionary people as I had been led to believe in my Democrat bubble. (Sound familiar again?)
Instead I found they were pretty decent people, so my mind opened up. I learned I too shared many of their values that they genuinely felt were being threatened. The journey into understanding the other side began. I never looked back.
Nor have I been unhappy with what I found. I am glad I was able to share both perspectives. And count myself as one more former Democrat whose current iteration of the Democrat party left them; not the other way around.
That said, I never supported GW Bush's invasion of Iraq or his pack of Dick Cheney led neo-cons. Instead I came to understand the wider dimensions of what conservatism and its values as a political movement was all about.
All good things in moderation. And honesty remains the best policy. For everyone. I felt Democrats as a party had become too dishonest to bear any further association with them.
Nor did I support the costly invasion of Iraq, Elce. Arguably, it was sloppy and bloody on how it was conducted. Yet, until you scratch the surface. Did you know for example, that Saddam Hussein plotted to assassinate Bush Sr.? Nothing calls for military action more than trying to assassinate a sitting president’s family! In the end, Hussein got what he deserved at the end of a rope!
Look at the disaster in Gaza. Where is the left’s outrage that Hamas is conducting mass public executions? That’s right, there is a video circulating that shows Hamas fighters breaking the legs and arms of an accused Israeli collaborator.
Further, look at the left’s outrageous reaction over US troops in blue run hellholes. It would seem they protest the death and destruction in Gaza, but say NOTHING about the mass killings of black males in their own failed urban communities! Oh, that’s right, Dems saying NOTHING when the perpetrators themselves, are non-white.
Good Article Brian…I'm amused by the 'No Kings, movement, which isn't organic. These people are being let around by the nose by the brainwashers. Think of it less, than 2% of the population — mostly older liberal minds, with very little input from the meaningful young crowd — whining, and complaining because they didn't get their wish for a Biden presidency.
Just goes to show how effective the CIA brainwashing has become, with the Ds being particularly hard hit, now that the media has been consolidated within six corporations (and totally controlled by a select few families).
Yet, many people, mostly Ds haven't yet figured it out that the MSM that they follow is the propaganda tool of the D PARTY. Should have become evident by their actions during Trump's first terms:
POTUS economy - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS job creating (record) - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS GPD - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS fair trade (protect America) - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS manufacturing - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS record low unemployment - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS tax reform (more take home money) - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS save the world from NK - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS stock market gains - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS undo harmful regulations - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS boost US energy dominance - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS protect US homeland - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS combatting opioids - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS accountability (audit Pentagon, SC, re-org executive branch etc.) - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS protecting life - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS helping Veterans - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS peace through strength - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS restore confidence/respect of US - not good enough - IMPEACH
When will the good Democrats wake up to the [D] Party con?
WHEN WAS the last time you witnessed a [D] party leader being Patriotic [exhibiting National Pride (love of Country)]?
WHEN WAS the last time you witnessed a [D] party leader 'speak out against' the riots [violence in the streets]?
WHEN WAS the last time you witnessed a [D] party leader support those who took at oath to protect and defend?
WHEN WAS the last time you witnessed a [D] party leader support and call for UNITY across our Nation?
DL: “Why do they want people divided?” Enrichment. Donations. Media attention to increase their flock. INdivisible sponsor of No Kings rallies needs to be renamed DIVISIBLE. That’s the organizations real goal.
Brian, congratulations on such a Raw piece of writing to tell the truth. I felt compelled to read it several times. You illustrated in detail what a clear and present danger the Democratic party has become, as Socialist/Marxists take over the reins of power. Many voters who habitually vote for the Democratic Party are decent, people who fail to see what you have illustrated. Unfortunately, they see President Trump as a greater danger. Yet many cannot explain why. Proposition 50, if passed, will end any pretense of democracy in California for generations to come. The exodus from this state will become an avalanche of companies and people, as taxes and regulations increase when taxpayers leave. What will be left of California, as a once prosperous state, I leave to your imagination.
Thank you, Brian. While I won’t end a friendship over someone voting yes on 50 (although I’ve had friends end theirs with me over it and my own Substack today is about how friendship should not be ruined by politics) — I wish the people in this beautiful state would wake up from their dream of still being a young hippie Democrat in the 60s and 70s, giving it to The Man and celebrating peace, love and understanding. Because we ain’t there anymore. That dream was co-opted and turned into a nightmare. If you want peace, love and understanding and true democracy - vote NO on Prop 50!
Get the NO Voters out. https://abev.optiqdata.com/. Update on Prop 50 ballot return: D+22.8%/ only a 13% voter turnout thus far.
Ballot % registered as compared to % of returned:
50.9% Dem 14.7%
26.1% GOP 14.4%
21.1% NPP 9.1%
White non Hispanic are 57% of registeted, returning 68% of returned ballots thusfar.
As one reader posted “Proposition 50, if passed, will end any pretense of democracy in California for generations to come. The exodus from this state will become an avalanche of companies and people, as taxes and regulations increase when taxpayers leave. What will be left of California, as a once prosperous state, I leave to your imagination.”
Polly please post link to your mentioned article on this topic.
Thank you, Montecito. Interesting. I must add I was perplexed by you telling me I was harsh towards Elaine yesterday. She attacked me first, calling my comment repulsive. I do believe in free speech and I wrote my Substack this morning about how I don't believe in ending friendships over politics: https://pollysnewsletter.substack.com/p/whats-politics-got-to-do-with-friendship
But you, like Dan O Siebert criticize me as hateful and harsh but you say nothing to Elaine who was actually hateful and harsh to me first. I'm not supposed to defend myself? I truly don't understand why you dislike me. I come here and politely comment. My comments are popular, so not everyone agrees with you. But really, I have the right to say f off to someone who insults me.
Right-on Pol
Elaine represents herself well in her posts as both ignorant and stupid. She’s unable to articulate her anger beyond name calling and repeating platitudes. Missives. Words. I get attacked frequently and consider the source. Is it worth responding? Sticks & stones break bones…. Defend against those who matter.
I welcome every dissenting post on SB Current from informed people who help me think, motivate me to research deeper. There are usually 2-sides to every story but as yet, Elaine falls short.
Thank you, Montecito and I agree. But I comment on other Substacks, like Absurdistan, Coffee & Covid and my friend Jim Kunstler's Clusterfuck Nation and never get this kind of Elaine or Julia Gonzalez ignorant venom - and these Substacks routinely get hundreds of comments and the last comment I did on Absurdistan got something like 90 likes. So, on the one hand I admire SB Current for being open but I don't like idiots getting the last word and that idiotic last word being what a visitor takes away.
Wow! I got a shout out from Polly! Even though she spelled my name wrong, and it was more of an insult, But then, that’s Polly’s style. If you agree with her it’s sunshine and flowers, if not watch out. It makes me happy I occupy a part of your headspace.
Julia, why would you think it's part of her Headspace as to responding to you?
I agree Polly. This reflects a change in political discourse over the last several years. In the old days I could have spirited arguments with friends and have a drink afterwards. Just like the old-time politicians.
Thank you - agree. I wrote about my own frustration with it today here — not pushing it on you, but the title is What's Politics Got to Do with Friendship? https://pollysnewsletter.substack.com/p/whats-politics-got-to-do-with-friendship
She was civil in her comments.
Great read!
It continually blows (what remains of) my mind that so many Californians seem oblivious to the damage Newsom and company continue to perpetrate on our beloved state.
I read this on internet the other day and thought it was pretty good, "The right made him a president, the left made him a king." Good article, Brian.
Well said Brian!!!!
Excellent recap of stats Brian. I completely concur, we celebrate for NO KINGS every July 4th, Thank you God!
The Left hate DJT so much, that creating a ballroom at the WH has unhinged them, even though not one penny is paid for by the US Government. Imagine that! Someone in the WH who works for no pay, who donates his own funds for improvements, and flag poles, and the myriad of other things he does, and the Left hates him. Their NO KINGS March was like a bunch of old white haired kids protesting because they lost.
Let's celebrate peace in 7 nations under Pres. Trump, the end to NGO's stealing tax payers funds, and small sizing the government, not to mention justice to the false Russian hoax and weaponizing the DOJ on one man, for 10 years. Let's see some justice!
Great article.
I would really appreciate a specific concrete example of a lost liberty or Trump’s violation of our Constitution?
No Kings had nothing to do with the election. It is a response to the power grab, the total disregard for the Constitution, the destruction of the balance of power that has kept this country from becoming a dictatorship, the cruelty of the implementation of the immigration policy (which most people agree with…criminals, drug traffickers etc), the vengeance and revenge for anyone who crosses “him”, the destruction of much of what makes us competitive (scientific research, education (always in need of reform) for example), the greedy lining of his own pockets and those of his cohorts and the reckless disregard for people in need who they are harming the most. I’ll say again, that we have deep problems in this country which need to be addressed. The Democrats did a piss poor job in so many ways. So did the Republicans in the past. We need a serious re-boot. But….the MEANS DO NOT JUSTIFY THE ENDS. That’s what the protests are about. I’m suggesting you try to see that. There is more agreement on what’s been wrong in the country than you think…I think. Finding and fueling more ways to be divided is not going to move the needle. You may not believe this (Polly certainly won’t) but I’m trying to listen and understand even as i disagree. You might want to do the same.
Elaine, So, because President Biden opened the border to more than ten million unvetted people, gave them cell phones, cash, hotel rooms, and the ability to work, all of which were against the laws of the United States (passed by a bi-partisan Congress), those people should now be given a free pass to stay and to continue to suck off the teat of the welfare mother state? Forever? How many and how much of that can we taxpayers take before we are all destitute? The only way the U.S. remains the last great hope of mankind is to retain its wealth and its strength. By giving it all away – which is what Biden and his minions were doing – we'd end up like the rich uncle who was so generous he drove himself into poverty. The optics of ICE agents and other law enforcement agencies pushing into crowds of "protestors" does sway the uninformed and, of course, the leftists and anarchists trying to bring the country down, but it's all agitprop: spit in an ICE agent's face until he reacts and then film the reaction and cry "police brutality." It often works, but it's all just theater.
No Kings is a stupid moniker for what is nothing more than a temper tantrum over losing an election and a fear of losing governent benefits. Kings are born into royalty, not elected. Truly, all of your objections to Trump are merely projection. The vengence of lawfare against Trump, the abandonment of real science during covid for an aurhoritarian response with nazi character. Lining pockets with ten percent for the big guy. You should try to understand the corruption in the Democrat party rather than blindly regurgitating talking points from The View
Insults don’t move the needle either. There is plenty of corruption in all of government. Call it a temper tantrum if that makes you feel superior or more adult-like. It doesn’t change what half the country finds offensive…and the degradation of the office of the Presidency is a starting point. Guessing you think the gold covered ballroom is a great investment as the government is shut down. Ah…just another detail in a very big picture.
Trump was heard to have said of the White House, "This place reminds me of a cheap pair of pants, no ballroom" Trump is paying for the improvement with his own money and donations.
Bull…I don’t believe he’s spending a dime of his own money and….he’s turning the White House into HIS (garish) house, in HIS image. It has been a symbol as the People’s House. Gone because of his narcissistic ego.
Elaine, please look up - over the decades what changes have been made to the White House and by which President?
You can't win with these pinheads. It is true that all presidents make changes to the White House but what sets Trump apart is that he is not using taxpayer dollars but his own and donations. You might say that it is garrish and a reflection of a repulsive character but, other presidents garrish self expression was at taxpayers expense and that is what I find repulsive.
But not as a tribute to themselves.
He donates his presidential salary to charities. Do your research.
His wealth has increased by 3 BILLION $ since he’s become president and moved 118 spots up on the wealthiest list. He doesn’t need a salary. He gets tributes from his subjects.
That’s a crock. I’ve yet to see a list of the charities it’s donated to.
It will soon be renamed to Mar-a- Lago North.
Yes, I’m aware all new presidents are given a budget to design and make the home comfortable for them, not to do a complete reconstruction, and if they did want to i’m sure they would’ve gotten it done the right way through Congress, which is the way it supposed to be done and not start tearing things down before they’ve even presented a plan to Congress or have permits or anything else legally. I am also aware that Mar-a-Lago was his home before he was president, which is why I’m saying he’ll rename the WH Mar-a-Lago North, because he doesn’t plan to leave. Do you remember Nixon’s place in California in San Clemente? He referred to it as the western White House.
more silliness...
To those mocking for redesigning the White House with his own money don't forget that
Hillary Clinton took all the furniture in the White House when Bills Term was over. That was bought by the people and owned by the people not the Clintons.
Hillary Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, faced controversy for taking about $28,000 worth of furnishings from the White House when they left office in 2001.
Or possibly pay with his $250M lawsuit against DoJ which coincidentally is the projected cost of the ballroom. Trump stated of approved he’d donate to ‘charity or even the ballroom’.
And you actually believe him?
How much did it cost Tax Payers for these protests using City services,police and Emergency.
All presidents change their residence but mostly on the tax payers Dime and Trump is not.
Hollow baseless whinning.
Offer specific examples Elaine: "lining of his own pockets", "scientific research", "education"...etc. Offer up specific identifiable examples, not obtuse general accusations. Bring something to the table...as if you are making a case to jury...provable details...not emotional partisan gibberish wound licking. For example, if you cite a specific situation where a program, etc was cut...explain what was the program, what is successful, why taxpayers should pay for it and the net result of the cut both fiscally and socially. Be serious please.
I think your questionee does not particularly want good debate, nor she does she want to "listen and understand" as she professes. She wants everyone to agree with her. She has a few big government promoters on The Current to agree with her tiresome rhetoric and for sure she is living in a town that depends on big government. So, your sentiments of her wanting to be serious is like spitting in the wind.
No they are not. They are definitely total against one person in the White House. They don't like far right policies and prefer far left. The speakers at the protestors were only there to promote those policies.
Mostly only Seniors,No minorities or young people.
Same people who protested and treated our Vietnam Vets so bad when they returned home.
Sponsored by 6 very wealthy Billionaires to the tune of $249 million.
Every organization in the poster was a Communist group,even CNN reported that.
They want a one party and Communist agendas.
Sorry…but this is not true. Were you there? The effort was promoted by a group called Indivisible…which started as an effort to bring people together. It is now more of a movement to allow the other half of the country a voice. I don’t know ANYONE who wants a one part system other than the current Republicans in office.
Other half a voice??? Did you not vote in the 2024 elections and have your voice then. It's not the Republicans fault that you had a terrible candidate that was installed and not elected. It's not the Republicans fault that the Dems have no policies besides Hate Trump. Libs always had a voice now they just want everyone to hear because they are sore losers.
If you search Indivisible that's what they want. They also call this administration facists throughout their web page.Georeg Soros a being donor to Indivisible. Indivisibles worth in 2023 was $12 dollars. They are also Tax exempt calimed as 501 4c on their tax documents. Yet we all have to pay taxes. I wasn't there but tax documents show who funded it. Also the fliers handed out have all the organizations that sponsor and they are all communists groups.
This is ridiculous
The truth is hard to swallow sometimes. They have you to believe one thing and not another. But in Reality Indivisible and other groups are causing harm to our democracy. A total PsychOp
Do your home Elaine...who funds Indivisible...??? Then lookup what other demonstrations and efforts they have funded. GM is correct. Do not be afraid to look at verifiable facts.
Some of your posts get a number of likes, which is great. I'm a little surprised that they do not post themselves and offer some form of support..
I'm still awaiting your response to my earlier post about supplying some data about your blanket charges against conservatives and Republicans, etc. It was a reasonable request... hopefully you're assembling that because it would be helpful to read it… absent opinion, of course. There is plenty of that to go around on all sides..
Incorrect that CNN said 'every organization was a commie group'. But they did say thatthe Communist Party USA’s logo was included among the listed sponsors.
that's not what I heard but I'm not gonna argue and I know for a fact several organizations were on the list of sponsors I saw the list including CPUSA the Communist Party of the USA.
I actually think if you go to the No Kings Web site you can see the list
Are you talking about Biden?
Elaine: Please enlighten readers: provide exact examples of “the total disregard for the Constitution”. Thank you.
From Chat…Below is a balanced, factual summary of key actions by Donald Trump that legal scholars, courts, or government watchdogs have argued violated (or came close to violating) the U.S. Constitution.
It doesn’t include ordinary political controversies — only events with constitutional implications.
⸻
⚖️ 1. Emoluments Clause Concerns
Clause involved: Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses (Article I, Section 9; Article II, Section 1)
Issue: The Constitution prohibits federal officials from receiving payments or benefits (“emoluments”) from foreign states or the U.S. government outside their official salary.
• Trump retained ownership of his business empire while in office, including hotels and properties patronized by foreign governments and lobbyists.
• Multiple lawsuits alleged this violated the Constitution because foreign governments (e.g., from Saudi Arabia, China) spent money at Trump hotels while seeking to influence U.S. policy.
• Courts dismissed some cases on procedural grounds (such as standing), but no court ruled that his behavior was fully constitutional either.
⸻
🏛️ 2. Attempts to Overturn the 2020 Election
Clauses involved: Article II (Electoral Process), 12th Amendment, and the peaceful transfer of power principle
• After losing the 2020 election, Trump and his allies pressured state officials (e.g., Georgia Secretary of State) to “find votes,” encouraged false electors, and pressured the Vice President to reject certified results.
• The January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol followed a rally in which Trump urged supporters to “fight like hell.”
• The House of Representatives impeached him for “incitement of insurrection,” arguing he violated his constitutional duty to uphold the law and facilitate a peaceful transfer of power.
• Several federal and state indictments (as of 2024–2025) allege that these efforts were part of a conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding — an act inconsistent with his constitutional oath.
⸻
📜 3. Obstruction of Congress
Clause involved: Separation of Powers
• During investigations (especially the Mueller investigation and later House oversight inquiries), Trump instructed aides and agencies not to comply with subpoenas.
• The House Judiciary Committee and constitutional scholars argued this obstructed Congress’s oversight authority, which is derived from its constitutional role.
• The House impeached Trump in 2019 for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress (over the Ukraine matter).
⸻
🇺🇸 4. Freedom of the Press & Speech Concerns
Clause involved: First Amendment
• Trump repeatedly called the press “the enemy of the people,” threatened to revoke broadcast licenses, and sought to block publication of books or leaks.
• While rhetoric alone isn’t unconstitutional, critics argue such threats from a sitting president undermine First Amendment protections by chilling free expression.
• He also blocked critics on Twitter from his official @realDonaldTrump account.
• In Knight First Amendment Institute v. Trump (2019), a federal appeals court ruled this violated the First Amendment because the account functioned as a public forum.
⸻
🧾 5. Misuse of Federal Funds (Ukraine Affair)
Clause involved: Impoundment Control Act & the Take Care Clause (Article II)
• In 2019, Trump withheld congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine while pressuring its president to investigate Joe Biden.
• The Government Accountability Office (GAO) found this violated federal law, and constitutional scholars argued it breached the president’s duty to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed.”
⸻
🧠 6. Potential 14th Amendment Issues (Post-Jan 6)
Clause involved: Section 3 of the 14th Amendment
• This clause bars anyone who has “engaged in insurrection” after taking an oath to the Constitution from holding office again.
• Several states and lawsuits have sought to disqualify Trump under this clause, though the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that only Congress has enforcement power over it (2024 ruling).
⸻
✅ To Be Clear
• Many of these issues were challenged but not all were definitively resolved in court.
• Trump was acquitted in both impeachment trials, meaning the Senate did not convict him.
• Still, multiple bipartisan legal experts (from the Federalist Society to liberal scholars) agree that several of these actions tested or violated constitutional norms, even if not criminally adjudicated.
When asked, Democrats could not explain what policy qualifies Trump as a king. Rather, Democrats are creatures of conformity and follow their party's cues without question. It is a strategy of the weak of character and the weak of mind. Democrats like to work for the government where success is measured by conformity rather than achievement. Democrats value conformity to party over all else.
100%
I enjoyed the beautiful fall day -- worked out, spent time with family--was not angry--just grateful I live in the United States.
Excellent. Excellent. Excellent. Thank you so much for putting this tour de force, spot on analysis in one keeper of an article. Bravo!
I really enjoyed the memes with Trump wearing his faux crown. The fighter jet flyover the no Kings rally dumping bovine feces was particularly special. Reminds me of him driving the trash truck and serving up fries at Mc Donald’s. The Dems are so easily lampooned.
Nicely written, Brian. Keep up the good work.
Mr. Campbell..... why would you list provable facts?
Isn't the story telling of the other side enough entertainment?
When they state RHNA after it was passed not constitutional under the State and continue it proves what you have stated.
It is not about Kings it is about power. The State is in a downward plunge with debt and unsustainable policies. The real producers are leaving which leaves who? (time to play Taps)
Good article.
Does anyone remember the last twice elected Republican President, George W. Bush? I sure do. Remember when the treasonous left accused Bush of being Mein Fuhrer? All right after a cataclysmic attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon.
This what the left does EVERY TIME there is a Republican in the White House. Mass demonstrations, slandering of our leaders and those who support them, (ie you and me.). This is all business as usual for the left, name calling, bullying, intimidation, threats of violence, boycotts, sit-ins, calls for investigations, all in a coordinated effort to change the results of an election that we the people have already decided.
How does this end? What will be the outcome when a significant population is clearly mentally challenged? Ironically, those yelling the loudest seem to be white, liberal women. Why?
If I had to guess, the left is reacting to their loss of control. In the meantime, normal people have had enough of the perverted left and the never ending calls for subsidies, hand outs, rights which never existed and acknowledgment of a fantasy, make believe world. All whereby the government provides for any and all needs, freedom to be who and what one wants (gender, farm animals etc.) and recognition of disenfranchised people of color, complete with reparations for past deeds committed by the white majority.
These people will never be satisfied with the goodness of our country, no matter who is in charge, their sickness will not allow them to be happy, law abiding, productive members of society.
This is what anarchy looks like.
I started my own journey into "conservatism" when GW Bush was re-elected. As a card-carrying Democrat at the time I was stunned at GW Bush's re-election. Who were these people who could not see what an incompetent fraud he was. (Sound familiar?).
So I started looking into who were these people I was now forced to spend the next four years living with. That is when I learned they loved their country, felt their families, value system and religious foundations that have long been drivers of the American Dream, were under attack by Big Government.
They simply wanted to hold on to all that they lived and cherished. They were not sinister, evil, backwards, reactionary people as I had been led to believe in my Democrat bubble. (Sound familiar again?)
Instead I found they were pretty decent people, so my mind opened up. I learned I too shared many of their values that they genuinely felt were being threatened. The journey into understanding the other side began. I never looked back.
Nor have I been unhappy with what I found. I am glad I was able to share both perspectives. And count myself as one more former Democrat whose current iteration of the Democrat party left them; not the other way around.
That said, I never supported GW Bush's invasion of Iraq or his pack of Dick Cheney led neo-cons. Instead I came to understand the wider dimensions of what conservatism and its values as a political movement was all about.
All good things in moderation. And honesty remains the best policy. For everyone. I felt Democrats as a party had become too dishonest to bear any further association with them.
Nor did I support the costly invasion of Iraq, Elce. Arguably, it was sloppy and bloody on how it was conducted. Yet, until you scratch the surface. Did you know for example, that Saddam Hussein plotted to assassinate Bush Sr.? Nothing calls for military action more than trying to assassinate a sitting president’s family! In the end, Hussein got what he deserved at the end of a rope!
Look at the disaster in Gaza. Where is the left’s outrage that Hamas is conducting mass public executions? That’s right, there is a video circulating that shows Hamas fighters breaking the legs and arms of an accused Israeli collaborator.
Further, look at the left’s outrageous reaction over US troops in blue run hellholes. It would seem they protest the death and destruction in Gaza, but say NOTHING about the mass killings of black males in their own failed urban communities! Oh, that’s right, Dems saying NOTHING when the perpetrators themselves, are non-white.
Good Article Brian…I'm amused by the 'No Kings, movement, which isn't organic. These people are being let around by the nose by the brainwashers. Think of it less, than 2% of the population — mostly older liberal minds, with very little input from the meaningful young crowd — whining, and complaining because they didn't get their wish for a Biden presidency.
Just goes to show how effective the CIA brainwashing has become, with the Ds being particularly hard hit, now that the media has been consolidated within six corporations (and totally controlled by a select few families).
Yet, many people, mostly Ds haven't yet figured it out that the MSM that they follow is the propaganda tool of the D PARTY. Should have become evident by their actions during Trump's first terms:
POTUS economy - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS job creating (record) - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS GPD - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS fair trade (protect America) - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS manufacturing - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS record low unemployment - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS tax reform (more take home money) - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS save the world from NK - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS stock market gains - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS undo harmful regulations - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS boost US energy dominance - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS protect US homeland - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS combatting opioids - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS accountability (audit Pentagon, SC, re-org executive branch etc.) - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS protecting life - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS helping Veterans - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS peace through strength - not good enough - IMPEACH.
POTUS restore confidence/respect of US - not good enough - IMPEACH
When will the good Democrats wake up to the [D] Party con?
WHEN WAS the last time you witnessed a [D] party leader being Patriotic [exhibiting National Pride (love of Country)]?
WHEN WAS the last time you witnessed a [D] party leader 'speak out against' the riots [violence in the streets]?
WHEN WAS the last time you witnessed a [D] party leader support those who took at oath to protect and defend?
WHEN WAS the last time you witnessed a [D] party leader support and call for UNITY across our Nation?
Why do they want people divided?
DL: “Why do they want people divided?” Enrichment. Donations. Media attention to increase their flock. INdivisible sponsor of No Kings rallies needs to be renamed DIVISIBLE. That’s the organizations real goal.
Brian, congratulations on such a Raw piece of writing to tell the truth. I felt compelled to read it several times. You illustrated in detail what a clear and present danger the Democratic party has become, as Socialist/Marxists take over the reins of power. Many voters who habitually vote for the Democratic Party are decent, people who fail to see what you have illustrated. Unfortunately, they see President Trump as a greater danger. Yet many cannot explain why. Proposition 50, if passed, will end any pretense of democracy in California for generations to come. The exodus from this state will become an avalanche of companies and people, as taxes and regulations increase when taxpayers leave. What will be left of California, as a once prosperous state, I leave to your imagination.