Discussion about this post

User's avatar
J. Livingston's avatar

While the local zero tolerance crowd screams the loudest constantly about cruise ships destroying our local environment, it is instructional to track all global shipping in real time on the website Marine Traffic. There you learn cruises ships in fact are few and far between in our local waters - they are the blue markers on the websites global map showing passenger vessels tracked world wide.

The bulk of global marine traffic consists of cargo ships, tankers, and no small numbers of fishing vessels. I suggest our local save the whales crowd needs to protest buying more junk from China, whose ocean trade routes contribute a large part of the current ocean traffic plying our oceans 24/7/365.

And particularly to stop demanding we produce no (zero tolerance) domestic fuel supplies, which in turn requires energy sources must be shipped in from farther away. We now have common recognition locally produced "green energy" sourcing has always been only a pipe dream; while dreaming erroneously there shall be no more local pipelines, ever and forever. Cognitive dissonance.

Marine Traffic: https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/centerx:-23.4/centery:8.9/zoom:2

Expand full comment
CarsAreBasic's avatar

NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) published a video having to do with green house gas over 20 years ago. PH.D. types were walking volcanoes and showing how one major eruption produced more GHG then all of mankind produced with civilization in one year.

Now fast forward to Kilauea on the big island of the Hawaiian chain. It has been on a eruption cycle of over 30 years. Just in the last year it has produced more GHG than all of the volcanoes world wide. Some of them have been serious large scale eruptions within the past decade. This means that one volcano has produced more GHG in just the past decade then industry has produced in well over 30 years (now add in the other eruptions and you see the issue). The speed good old nature has done this is amazing.

Ignore the great charts of this article. Ignore the fact that the voters gave Sacramento both the power and dollars to do proper forest management. Forget that the outcome of Gov. Newsom failures in Calif. forest management has cost lives, million if not billions of damaged homes and businesses, and disruption of lives and hey, how about those insurance costs.

What are you going to do now that nature has dwarfed all of the one party system in Sacramento?

There is so much more to add into this mix solar, wind farms, toxic batteries, etc.

Just remember Ms. Capps and friends are small potatoes in the equation but then so are the radicalized EPA under past administrations. There is where serious damage to both the nation and the world is.

Now with AI where is the estimates of particulate air matter with the natives pre-Cabrillo? Where is the estimates of hydrocarbon emissions good old nature was pumping into the air both in the channel and on land up and down the coast pre-Cabrillo?

There is a whole missing dimension that the sky is falling groups have yet to address.

Expand full comment
36 more comments...

No posts