Andy, just earlier this week, the Trump administration EPA (the P stands for “protection”, funny enough) slashed mercury regulations from coal plants.
Mercury pollution from coal plants has been tied to serious neurological problems, especially in children and babies. I’m sure you’d be in agreement with the EPA, as a staunch protector of the environment.
Come to think of it, The coal miners did give Trump a gold statue early last week, so perhaps that’s why he eliminated those pesky mercury regulations.
A, thank you for reporting about the actual results of our highly touted Climate Action plan. I would love to read more across our relatively thin media ecosystem although I strongly suspect it will go unreported. Spending is easy but tying it to positive results, well, not so much (e.g., homelessness, education, etc.). Thank you!
I do believe the point of making cars unaffordable is so you can’t go anywhere. Trapped in a 15-min city you can’t leave and where you need a good social credit score in order to buy your glyphosate-loaded bread which will make you sick and feed the medical community which will load you up with more drugs to make you sicker. Until you die. Or until you need to be euthanized for the organs you have that some billionaire wants (apparently Canada is doing this very thing.) Although I cannot, for the life of me understand why you would want a glyphosate/drug-riddled liver to replace the one you are losing from those very same reasons. Anyway, I think not affording a car is intentional. And I also don’t really think cleaning the air up is a real focus when you consider all the aerosols loaded with toxic chemicals and heavy metals being injected in the atmosphere by the billions of tons on a daily basis. Or the chemicals released into the environment from making things like solar panels or windmills. Or the damage to the weather patterns and ecology those things are causing. Nope. It’s all a coverup to reduce the human population who are, by and large, considered useless eaters. I’m not sure I understand what the leftover humanoids will actually have left on this planet that they are trying to reserve for themselves, though. I can’t imagine it will look or be very appealing.
Andy, just earlier this week, the Trump administration EPA (the P stands for “protection”, funny enough) slashed mercury regulations from coal plants.
Mercury pollution from coal plants has been tied to serious neurological problems, especially in children and babies. I’m sure you’d be in agreement with the EPA, as a staunch protector of the environment.
Come to think of it, The coal miners did give Trump a gold statue early last week, so perhaps that’s why he eliminated those pesky mercury regulations.
What is your goal?
Is the dollar that important to you that it will allow pollution of the environment?
I assume you are taking a sailboat to Turkey and a Camel for local transportation.
A, thank you for reporting about the actual results of our highly touted Climate Action plan. I would love to read more across our relatively thin media ecosystem although I strongly suspect it will go unreported. Spending is easy but tying it to positive results, well, not so much (e.g., homelessness, education, etc.). Thank you!
I do believe the point of making cars unaffordable is so you can’t go anywhere. Trapped in a 15-min city you can’t leave and where you need a good social credit score in order to buy your glyphosate-loaded bread which will make you sick and feed the medical community which will load you up with more drugs to make you sicker. Until you die. Or until you need to be euthanized for the organs you have that some billionaire wants (apparently Canada is doing this very thing.) Although I cannot, for the life of me understand why you would want a glyphosate/drug-riddled liver to replace the one you are losing from those very same reasons. Anyway, I think not affording a car is intentional. And I also don’t really think cleaning the air up is a real focus when you consider all the aerosols loaded with toxic chemicals and heavy metals being injected in the atmosphere by the billions of tons on a daily basis. Or the chemicals released into the environment from making things like solar panels or windmills. Or the damage to the weather patterns and ecology those things are causing. Nope. It’s all a coverup to reduce the human population who are, by and large, considered useless eaters. I’m not sure I understand what the leftover humanoids will actually have left on this planet that they are trying to reserve for themselves, though. I can’t imagine it will look or be very appealing.