May 15·edited May 15Liked by Santa Barbara Current
excellent summary of the creation of the Department of Education and its subsequent history of twisted logic applied to break up the family unit (Nixon 1972) and the further degradation of women via Title IX…our system of government has been infiltrated by corrupt and sinister elements…
imagine the lengths that would have been gained if HRC won the 2016 Presidential Election… Democracy was almost lost forever…
Think HRC install: [2+] Supreme Court Justices, 200+ judges, rogue elements expanded inside DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, WH, STATE, …….removal 2nd amendment, border etc. ……… America for sale: China, Russia, Iran, Syria…….ISIS & AL Q expansion…….expansion surv of domestic citizens…….modify/change voter rules and regulations allow illegals+ballot harvesting w/ SC backed liberal-social opinion………sell off of military to highest bidder to fight internal long-standing wars……..
Their thirst for a one world order [destruction of national sovereignty] serves to obtain control over America [and her allies [think EU]] by diluting your vote to oblivion and installing a new one world ruling party.
The start of this concept began with organizations such as: world health org, world trade org, united nations, ICC, NATO, etc., [all meant to weaken the United States] also the formation of EU through threat [con] of close proximity attack [attack on one is an attack on all – sales pitch to gen public – fear control].
PS…Fight 4 Trump, the man standing between US & the Cabal of evildoers…
These people shouldn’t be allowed around children yet alone in charge of them. We need to stop outsourcing the raising of our children to these vile, globalist pedophiles and immediately yank back our National education system from them.
Recent Aaron Rogers and Tucker Carlson conversation did allude to this very thing going on in Wash DC. An alleged and now long-standing rumor, not yet dying nor debunked. How did these two pundits get it so wrong?
⚠️Excellent summation and chronology. Another example of federal government expansion, overreach, and increasing dangers to females. If the original intent of was to only collect data from the states, why can’t another department [Commerce?] collect and compile this information from states? It’s beyond time to end federal, state and local dictates to accept men as women; and for every American citizen to advocate for equal rights of naturally born females. There will be fewer medical interventions, if and when Americans choose to stop paying for them.
May 15·edited May 15Liked by Santa Barbara Current
Was the federal office of education created to provide funding for border states soon to be disproportionately impacted by the pending 1982 SOTUS ruling which ultimately mandated free K-12 education, regardless of legal resident status?
This mandated free K-12 ruling created an undue financial burden on border states in the 1980's. Hence, a federal office of education could now supplement what had been an exclusive state function - public education for its own legal residents.
How is this any different than the Land Grant Colleges (Morrill Act of 1862) and the establishment of thousands of "one room school houses" to educate and assimilate millions of immigrant children in the 19th-20th Centuries (my ancestors included)?
Legal and hihgly-vetted immigration compared to the current unplanned and illegal border crashing, tainted by drugs and cartel human trafficking would be one obvious difference. Did you miss that?
What does your comment have to do with children going to school? "Legal and highly vetted immigration"? You do realize that the border was WIDE OPEN until the 1890's. Everyone was "legal" and "vetted." You could just walk across the border from Mexico (like some of my wife's ancestors did), or just pay passage on a ship that stopped at a U.S. port (like my ancestors did). When organized "human trafficking" of Italian and Eastern European immigrants began in the 1890's rules were put in place to put controls on the incoming multitudes, except "NO CHINESE ALLOWED." The Border Patrol is celebrating its centennial this very year, so there was NO border patrol until 1924. And it was created to control the smuggling of alcohol by "tequileros" after the 18th Amendment was adopted and made importation of alcohol a crime. You could "legally" smoke a joint or sip on a Coca[ine]-Cola, but not drink a beer! As for the drugs, just like alcohol in the 1920's, if there were no Americans BUYING the drugs, the smuggling would end. Are you suggesting that our country would be better off if all those immigrants children were denied an education? Uneducated children accounted for much of the street crimes in Eastern cities in the late 19th-Century, which was another reason schools and truancy laws were established to eliminate the problem. But, some of us apparently learn nothing from the lessons of history.
Eliminate incentives and tax payer costs that support continued illegal border crossing. Period.
Agree, America's own drug habits are the root cause of the violent cartel malaise, now inflicted up and down the supply chain. Any more thoughts about this part of the Biden open border crisis, that he chose to inflict on the rest of us?
Is the whole world nuts???? Forget this trans crap - men are men and women are women. I suggest a whole lot less ‘accommodation’ and a lot more mental health services!
So if I understand your messaging, the new regulations put the burden of protecting girls from sexual discrimination and predation on all the people responsible for the girls’ wellbeing. And you have a problem with that? It is no coincidence that the people who are suing against this are also the people who believe that a girl raped by a family member or friend should bear their child to term. And you support them. You sound like someone who has never had a daughter, niece, or sister or know anyone who does.
The burden of protecting girls falls on those responsible for girls? Hmmm. I don't think that is the issue. It is enshrining crackpot ideas. It drives a wedge between the family and the child. Taking that path further damages the integrity of family units which increases the centralizaton of power. Centralized power might be categorized as globalist, though it will take time to get to that full blown extreme. Pedophile? Seems to me that there in an inordinate interest in the sex of children by those who should be thinking of other things. You are projecting in your third and fourth sentences. Don't assume what I think.
Circular reasoning. But think of all the parents that turned a blind eye to serial predators because they thought that their daughter’s physical and mental health was secondary to the chance that they could be parents of an Olympic star. This would not drive a wedge in any reasonable family.
You’re correct that too many parents turn a blind eye to the reality of predators, or simply trust because we assume those in positions of authority — whether coaches, administrators or other team or class parents — are not grooming or focused on sex with a minor or drugging them. There’s no protection beyond close vetting of a few other parents who agree to keep eyes and ears open to the unexpected and ensure coverage of all events, and meets. It’s sad but true: minors need one actively involved 24/7 parent, or a circle of parents until adulthood or longer.
Eric, which specific state restricts abortion in case of incest rape, per your claim?
..............."Abortion is currently banned in 14 states and many other states have attempted to ban or severely restrict access to abortion.
Nearly all of these bans include exceptions, which generally fall into four categories: to prevent the death of the pregnant person, when there is risk to the health of the pregnant person, when the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest, and when there is a lethal fetal anomaly"................
Isn't "the pregnant person" a woman? A woman is more than "a life support system for uterus." If you don't have a uterus, shut up. Abortion was legal in the USA when our founding fathers established it. They didn't give women the right to vote, but they did allow them to decide whether or not they wanted to remain pregnant. It was several decades after the Revolution that that right was stripped away.
Eric, looks like we have a battle of factoids going on here and not a good faith search for truth.
............ "Texas Governor Greg Abbott defended his state's strict new abortion law, saying that it doesn't force victims of rape and incest to carry their pregnancy to term because it "provides at least 6 weeks for a person to be able to get an abortion." ..............
(I won't bother looking up each state that you list because I suspect, like your claim about Texas, I will find your statement will not sound in fact.)
Southern Louisiana’s population grows thanks to incest, and is the main source of incest research. I cannot imagine Louisiana ever allowing a law allowing abortion as a result of incest! TX is the state of strong frontier women: think Gov Richardson and her daughter, past CEO of national Planned Parenthood Federation USA. LA is Christian male dependent Southern Bells; Napoleonic laws. Without a male, you are nothing in LA.
Personally, I feel that if you are going to have organized sports, there should be THREE sports categories: Male, Female, Trans. There are already competition sports categories for "Special Olympians" and the "Paralympians." Let the Trans athletes compete with other Trans athletes who share their unique physiques. Of course, there is another solution, but one that may not be popular. When I was stationed in Germany with the U.S. Army, my daughter attended a German school instead of the Dept. of Defense school on base. The German public school had no sports facilities, just classrooms! If you wanted to be on a "swim team" "basketball team" or play soccer, you joined a sports club and did that on weekends on your own time. School was for academics, so none of the budget was expended on sports. Just think of the money that could be saved! We could build new classrooms on the now unnecessary football field, swimming pool, and gymnasium. Likewise, there were no "yellow buses" to drive around just students. My daughter had to walk, ride her bike, or take the city bus to school. No buses, no bus drivers, no bus maintenance or storage facilities - we could save millions!! Just repaint the buses and use them and the drivers for public transportation.
We probably would not have a powerful federal Department of Education if those same Red states had not resisted the integration of schools. How can you forget the ugliness of adult men and women spitting on and taunting very young children trying to get an education.
Those red states kept their ugly policies and became Republicans in response to the Civil Rights act in the 1960s introduced and passed by a president who was a Democrat. What is important is not the party affiliation but the policies and intentions of the states. Isn’t there a famous saying that you can put lipstick on a pig but it’s still a pig? Many of those poor southern states, no matter what you call them, are still pigs.
There is a reason that white nationalists and racists feel comfortable supporting the Republican party.
We won't see a challenge to this lunacy from California (that doesn't surprise anyone). What continues to baffle me is the complete lack of any common sense regarding this gender issue. It's a stark example of how minds and hearts can be hardened. The department of education has been a complete mess since "government" became involved. It's time to disband it on the Federal level and re-organize (revamp) it on the State level. And the only way that may remotely happen is if Donald Trump is elected in November. The only way.
excellent summary of the creation of the Department of Education and its subsequent history of twisted logic applied to break up the family unit (Nixon 1972) and the further degradation of women via Title IX…our system of government has been infiltrated by corrupt and sinister elements…
imagine the lengths that would have been gained if HRC won the 2016 Presidential Election… Democracy was almost lost forever…
Think HRC install: [2+] Supreme Court Justices, 200+ judges, rogue elements expanded inside DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, WH, STATE, …….removal 2nd amendment, border etc. ……… America for sale: China, Russia, Iran, Syria…….ISIS & AL Q expansion…….expansion surv of domestic citizens…….modify/change voter rules and regulations allow illegals+ballot harvesting w/ SC backed liberal-social opinion………sell off of military to highest bidder to fight internal long-standing wars……..
Their thirst for a one world order [destruction of national sovereignty] serves to obtain control over America [and her allies [think EU]] by diluting your vote to oblivion and installing a new one world ruling party.
The start of this concept began with organizations such as: world health org, world trade org, united nations, ICC, NATO, etc., [all meant to weaken the United States] also the formation of EU through threat [con] of close proximity attack [attack on one is an attack on all – sales pitch to gen public – fear control].
PS…Fight 4 Trump, the man standing between US & the Cabal of evildoers…
PSS…May is Chemtrail Awareness Month…pass it on… https://www.frankenskiesthemovie.com/
These people shouldn’t be allowed around children yet alone in charge of them. We need to stop outsourcing the raising of our children to these vile, globalist pedophiles and immediately yank back our National education system from them.
Wow! Conspiracy theory central! Globalist and pedophile? Are you serious?
Recent Aaron Rogers and Tucker Carlson conversation did allude to this very thing going on in Wash DC. An alleged and now long-standing rumor, not yet dying nor debunked. How did these two pundits get it so wrong?
⚠️Excellent summation and chronology. Another example of federal government expansion, overreach, and increasing dangers to females. If the original intent of was to only collect data from the states, why can’t another department [Commerce?] collect and compile this information from states? It’s beyond time to end federal, state and local dictates to accept men as women; and for every American citizen to advocate for equal rights of naturally born females. There will be fewer medical interventions, if and when Americans choose to stop paying for them.
Thanks, Brent. This will be the end of women's sports if it isn't battled down.
Was the federal office of education created to provide funding for border states soon to be disproportionately impacted by the pending 1982 SOTUS ruling which ultimately mandated free K-12 education, regardless of legal resident status?
This mandated free K-12 ruling created an undue financial burden on border states in the 1980's. Hence, a federal office of education could now supplement what had been an exclusive state function - public education for its own legal residents.
How is this any different than the Land Grant Colleges (Morrill Act of 1862) and the establishment of thousands of "one room school houses" to educate and assimilate millions of immigrant children in the 19th-20th Centuries (my ancestors included)?
Legal and hihgly-vetted immigration compared to the current unplanned and illegal border crashing, tainted by drugs and cartel human trafficking would be one obvious difference. Did you miss that?
What does your comment have to do with children going to school? "Legal and highly vetted immigration"? You do realize that the border was WIDE OPEN until the 1890's. Everyone was "legal" and "vetted." You could just walk across the border from Mexico (like some of my wife's ancestors did), or just pay passage on a ship that stopped at a U.S. port (like my ancestors did). When organized "human trafficking" of Italian and Eastern European immigrants began in the 1890's rules were put in place to put controls on the incoming multitudes, except "NO CHINESE ALLOWED." The Border Patrol is celebrating its centennial this very year, so there was NO border patrol until 1924. And it was created to control the smuggling of alcohol by "tequileros" after the 18th Amendment was adopted and made importation of alcohol a crime. You could "legally" smoke a joint or sip on a Coca[ine]-Cola, but not drink a beer! As for the drugs, just like alcohol in the 1920's, if there were no Americans BUYING the drugs, the smuggling would end. Are you suggesting that our country would be better off if all those immigrants children were denied an education? Uneducated children accounted for much of the street crimes in Eastern cities in the late 19th-Century, which was another reason schools and truancy laws were established to eliminate the problem. But, some of us apparently learn nothing from the lessons of history.
Eliminate incentives and tax payer costs that support continued illegal border crossing. Period.
Agree, America's own drug habits are the root cause of the violent cartel malaise, now inflicted up and down the supply chain. Any more thoughts about this part of the Biden open border crisis, that he chose to inflict on the rest of us?
Is the whole world nuts???? Forget this trans crap - men are men and women are women. I suggest a whole lot less ‘accommodation’ and a lot more mental health services!
Are you familiar with current mental health services locally? Best to avoid unless you’re progressive.
Andrew Johnson not Jackson.
Thank you, Ed. Corrected online.
So if I understand your messaging, the new regulations put the burden of protecting girls from sexual discrimination and predation on all the people responsible for the girls’ wellbeing. And you have a problem with that? It is no coincidence that the people who are suing against this are also the people who believe that a girl raped by a family member or friend should bear their child to term. And you support them. You sound like someone who has never had a daughter, niece, or sister or know anyone who does.
The burden of protecting girls falls on those responsible for girls? Hmmm. I don't think that is the issue. It is enshrining crackpot ideas. It drives a wedge between the family and the child. Taking that path further damages the integrity of family units which increases the centralizaton of power. Centralized power might be categorized as globalist, though it will take time to get to that full blown extreme. Pedophile? Seems to me that there in an inordinate interest in the sex of children by those who should be thinking of other things. You are projecting in your third and fourth sentences. Don't assume what I think.
Circular reasoning. But think of all the parents that turned a blind eye to serial predators because they thought that their daughter’s physical and mental health was secondary to the chance that they could be parents of an Olympic star. This would not drive a wedge in any reasonable family.
You’re correct that too many parents turn a blind eye to the reality of predators, or simply trust because we assume those in positions of authority — whether coaches, administrators or other team or class parents — are not grooming or focused on sex with a minor or drugging them. There’s no protection beyond close vetting of a few other parents who agree to keep eyes and ears open to the unexpected and ensure coverage of all events, and meets. It’s sad but true: minors need one actively involved 24/7 parent, or a circle of parents until adulthood or longer.
Eric, which specific state restricts abortion in case of incest rape, per your claim?
..............."Abortion is currently banned in 14 states and many other states have attempted to ban or severely restrict access to abortion.
Nearly all of these bans include exceptions, which generally fall into four categories: to prevent the death of the pregnant person, when there is risk to the health of the pregnant person, when the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest, and when there is a lethal fetal anomaly"................
Isn't "the pregnant person" a woman? A woman is more than "a life support system for uterus." If you don't have a uterus, shut up. Abortion was legal in the USA when our founding fathers established it. They didn't give women the right to vote, but they did allow them to decide whether or not they wanted to remain pregnant. It was several decades after the Revolution that that right was stripped away.
Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi (exception for rape but not incest), Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Texas.
Eric, looks like we have a battle of factoids going on here and not a good faith search for truth.
............ "Texas Governor Greg Abbott defended his state's strict new abortion law, saying that it doesn't force victims of rape and incest to carry their pregnancy to term because it "provides at least 6 weeks for a person to be able to get an abortion." ..............
(I won't bother looking up each state that you list because I suspect, like your claim about Texas, I will find your statement will not sound in fact.)
Six weeks? Wow, such a window. Let's be honest and call it two weeks?
Does it even take six weeks to acknowledge you were raped by a family member?
OK, then why such a huge and and sinful 6 week timeline. 6 hours might be more appropriate then?
Southern Louisiana’s population grows thanks to incest, and is the main source of incest research. I cannot imagine Louisiana ever allowing a law allowing abortion as a result of incest! TX is the state of strong frontier women: think Gov Richardson and her daughter, past CEO of national Planned Parenthood Federation USA. LA is Christian male dependent Southern Bells; Napoleonic laws. Without a male, you are nothing in LA.
Why aren't you worried about the safety and wellbeing of boys?
Very good point. But we are discussing Title IX, which looks after girls and young women in sports.
Personally, I feel that if you are going to have organized sports, there should be THREE sports categories: Male, Female, Trans. There are already competition sports categories for "Special Olympians" and the "Paralympians." Let the Trans athletes compete with other Trans athletes who share their unique physiques. Of course, there is another solution, but one that may not be popular. When I was stationed in Germany with the U.S. Army, my daughter attended a German school instead of the Dept. of Defense school on base. The German public school had no sports facilities, just classrooms! If you wanted to be on a "swim team" "basketball team" or play soccer, you joined a sports club and did that on weekends on your own time. School was for academics, so none of the budget was expended on sports. Just think of the money that could be saved! We could build new classrooms on the now unnecessary football field, swimming pool, and gymnasium. Likewise, there were no "yellow buses" to drive around just students. My daughter had to walk, ride her bike, or take the city bus to school. No buses, no bus drivers, no bus maintenance or storage facilities - we could save millions!! Just repaint the buses and use them and the drivers for public transportation.
We probably would not have a powerful federal Department of Education if those same Red states had not resisted the integration of schools. How can you forget the ugliness of adult men and women spitting on and taunting very young children trying to get an education.
Yes, Southern Democrats have a lot to answer for....
Those red states kept their ugly policies and became Republicans in response to the Civil Rights act in the 1960s introduced and passed by a president who was a Democrat. What is important is not the party affiliation but the policies and intentions of the states. Isn’t there a famous saying that you can put lipstick on a pig but it’s still a pig? Many of those poor southern states, no matter what you call them, are still pigs.
There is a reason that white nationalists and racists feel comfortable supporting the Republican party.
We won't see a challenge to this lunacy from California (that doesn't surprise anyone). What continues to baffle me is the complete lack of any common sense regarding this gender issue. It's a stark example of how minds and hearts can be hardened. The department of education has been a complete mess since "government" became involved. It's time to disband it on the Federal level and re-organize (revamp) it on the State level. And the only way that may remotely happen is if Donald Trump is elected in November. The only way.
This Breitbart article is based on a NYT piece.
https://www.breitbart.com/health/2024/05/15/u-s-transgender-industry-rejects-warnings-from-british-science-report/