On June 6, 2025, the videos of the crowd waving Mexican flags is a clear illustration of the invasion of Los Angeles.
For days and nights, Los Angeles has been under attack from agitators lighting cars on fire, attacking law enforcement, destroying police cars, and hurling explosives at an ICE facility: the terrorists have been taking over the streets.
On Sunday, June 10, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) Central Division reported that business owners were reporting that their stores were being looted in the area of 6th St. and Broadway.
The invasion could be said to have begun in 2021 when the Biden-Harris administration opened the U.S. southern border.
California’s policy of calling itself a “Sanctuary State,” that is pledged to offer an ever-increasing grab bag of free goodies, from education, to rent, to food, to medical care, to drivers’ licenses, and even to the right to vote, led to it being a preferred destination for many, including a large contingent planning to take advantage of this state’s misinformed largesse. Is there any wonder why these miscreants feel empowered to resist law enforcement?
Viva La Mexico?
The proliferation of Mexican flags being waved leads to the question: how lawful is Mexico?
The U.S. Department of State (.gov) uses a four-level system for travel advisories, ranging from “Exercise Normal Precautions” to “Do Not Travel.” Each level indicates the degree of risk associated with traveling to a specific country or region.
Level 4
This is the highest advisory level issued by the U.S. Department of State, indicating that there are severe dangers to be aware of, and that the U.S. government may have limited ability to provide assistance should an emergency occur.
This State Department advisory warns U.S. citizens that travel to the following areas of Mexico is dangerous and should be avoided for the following reasons:
Do not travel to:
Colima state due to crime and kidnapping.
Guerrero state due to crime.
Michoacan state due to crime.
Sinaloa state due to crime.
Tamaulipas state due to crime and kidnapping.
Zacatecas state due to crime and kidnapping.
Level 3
Reconsider travel. This level advises travelers to reconsider their trip to the destination due to serious risks to safety and security.
Reconsider Travel To:
Baja California state due to crime and kidnapping.
Chiapas state due to crime.
Chihuahua state due to crime and kidnapping.
Guanajuato state due to crime.
Jalisco state due to crime and kidnapping.
Morelos state due to crime and kidnapping.
Sonora state due to crime and kidnapping.
Level 2
Exercise increased caution. This level suggests that there are increased risks to safety and security, and travelers should be aware of potential dangers.
Exercise Increased Caution When Traveling To:
Aguascalientes state due to crime.
Baja California Sur state due to crime.
Coahuila state due to crime.
Durango state due to crime.
Hidalgo state due to crime.
Mexico City due to crime.
Mexico State due to crime and kidnapping.
Nayarit state due to crime.
Nuevo Leon state due to crime.
Oaxaca state due to crime.
Puebla state due to crime and kidnapping.
Queretaro state due to crime.
Quintana Roo state due to crime.
San Luis Potosi state due to crime and kidnapping.
Tabasco state due to crime.
Tlaxcala state due to crime.
Veracruz state due to crime.
Level 1
Exercise normal caution. This is the lowest level, indicating that there are some risks associated with any international travel, but the country is generally safe for travel.
Exercise Normal Precautions When Traveling To:
Country Summary
Violent crime – such as homicide, kidnapping, carjacking, and robbery – is widespread and common in Mexico. The U.S. government has limited ability to provide emergency services to U.S. citizens in many areas of Mexico, as travel by U.S. government employees to certain areas is prohibited or restricted. In many states, local emergency services are limited outside the state capital or major cities.
U.S. citizens are advised to adhere to restrictions on U.S. government employee travel.
U.S. government employees may not:
• travel between cities after dark,
• may not hail taxis on the street,
• must rely on dispatched vehicles, including app-based services like Uber, and regulated taxi stands
• should avoid traveling alone, especially in remote areas
• may not drive from the U.S.-Mexico border to or from the interior of Mexico, except daytime travel within Baja California and between Nogales and Hermosillo on Mexican Federal Highway 15D, between Nuevo Laredo and Monterrey on Highway 85D and between Ciudad Juarez and interior cities as noted in the Chihuahua section.
Conclusion
Why would anyone from this country decide to comply with the law in Los Angeles?
No doubt places in Mexico are unsafe. However there’s more to the Los Angeles riots and those in other cities. Please post what you know. BEFORE ATTENDING Saturday, ‘No King’ protest, know what you’re attending. Please do your homework: who’s involved, who’s funding it. These protests are about the future survival of our country funded by dark money. Who funds IndivisibleSB and nationally? Who is the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL), but a socialist group tied to pro-Chinese Communist Party (CCP) millionaire American Neville Singham and others in the CCP. Isn’t the Communist Chinese Party an identified prospective threat across the Pacific?
A taxpayer grant supported organization behind the LA anti-ICE demonstrations, and No King, is The Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, CHIRLA, an open border advocacy group. The Open Society Foundation has ties to the Coalition.
The State of California has given the Coalition a massive amount of money in grants, about $34 million in 2023 alone. In addition, the Biden administration gave the Coalition almost $200,000 in 2023. So, in effect, taxpayer money is funding the violent protests we’ve observed since last Friday plus those planned Saturday, Flag Day. Ask yourself: why is this? The FBI is investigating.
https://x.com/marionawfal/status/1933006343163826545?s=46
https://x.com/laurapowellesq/status/1931955511693336595?s=46
https://x.com/laurapowellesq/status/1933004880568070218?s=46
Isn’t it possible that this week’s L.A. protests, Saturday’s No King demonstrations, are not about ICE or Trump or legal and political concerns? Rather, aren’t these protests dark money funded for a different reason? Could it be that our tax dollars are being used by our elected leaders to fund nihilists and anarchists while the truth is withheld by the media?
Looks like there’s an effort to further divide our country, and Santa Barbara community. Seek the truth. UNITE AS NEIGHBORS & AMERICANS. Stay vigilant. Help inform others.
Local ‘No King’ Protest will be a human chain Saturday at Chase Palm Park. It is sponsored by several local tax exempt, tax & donor supported NPOs. Check on line at SBIndividible.
LA Wasn’t a Protest — It Was an Insurrection
This was no protest.
It was a deliberate, violent confrontation with federal authority.
Under federal law, this behavior constitutes:
18 U.S. Code §115 — Threats or retaliation against federal officers
18 U.S. Code §1503 — Obstruction of justice
18 U.S. Code §2384 — Seditious conspiracy:
“…to oppose by force the authority of the United States…”
This isn’t just a street fight.
It’s a movement of organized, ideological resistance to U.S. law, U.S. agents, and U.S. sovereignty.