Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brian's avatar

As to the 90 units on Milpas.

Between there, Macys, 5 Points, Glenn Annie, behind the Natural History Museum they are building hundreds of tiny apartments .

Little to no parking.

People who live here are going to work where? They will have cars and they will park in the surrounding areas.

We are in a D2 drought, I’m sure glad we increased our water reservoirs. Oh wait, that is just wishful thinking that the government did as they promised and were pro active about their shoving more people into SB.

No homeownership either, renters.

So who is going to live in these tiny apartments? Couples? Families? Children? Impact on schools? Taxes for the school budget?

What we do know is that our government does not think of the citizens of SB and they are not very above board. Look at the AMR contract they purposefully tried to get out of costing us tax payers millions or the oil spill on land they control and tried to hide while going after oil companies for doing the same thing.

Incompetence?

Expand full comment
J. Livingston's avatar

We can thank our own present and past elected state representatives for "The Builders Remedy". Their one task when we send them to Sacramento - is to write legislation in our names.

So be sure to include the names Das Williams, Hannah-Beth Jackson, Monique Limon and Gregg Hart specifically, in any complaints about what the "state" is or has been doing to our community.

Copping-out and voting only "present" when these locally controversial issues come before these locally elected Sacramento representatives is intentionally negligent. None of them deserve their automatic re-election, encouraged by local partisan forces who support this continued non-representation of our local interests as long as their own pockets get lined.

Expand full comment
71 more comments...

No posts